论“教唆”他人违反注意义务行为的刑事责任  

On the Criminal Responsibility of "Instigating" Others'Violation of Duty of Care

作　　者：徐肖艺 Xu Xiaoyi(Zhongnan University of Economics and Law,Wuhan 430073,China)

机构地区：[1]中南财经政法大学法学院,湖北武汉430073

出　　处：《湖北警官学院学报》2021年第4期130-138,共9页Journal of Hubei University of Police

摘　　要：过失犯的本质是违反注意义务,作为一种客观存在的现象,故意“教唆”他人违反注意义务引起过失犯罪的行为,其可罚性已经得到了司法解释的认可;但是在现有的刑法理论框架内,为教唆人找到处罚依据似乎还存在一定的障碍。我国共同犯罪理论强调行为人之间的犯罪意思联络,以共同故意为其成立条件,因此过失共同犯罪这种犯罪类型被拒之门外;如果认为教唆人与被教唆人以各自的行为成立过失犯,单纯的教唆行为是否具有过失犯的实行行为性存在疑问。在立法层面,不管是共同犯罪的规定还是教唆犯的规定,都为处罚“教唆”他人违反注意义务的行为设置了障碍。考察国外的立法规定,应修正我国有关共同犯罪的立法规定,为处罚过失共同犯罪扫清障碍。The essence of negligent offense is the violation of duty of care. As an objective phenomenon, deliberately "instigating" others to violate the duty of care to cause negligent crime.Its punability has been recognized by judicial interpretation;but in the existing criminal law theory Within the framework, it seems that there are still some obstacles to finding a basis for punishment for abettors. At the theoretical level, my country’s joint crime theory emphasizes the connection of criminal intentions between the perpetrators, and the establishment of joint intention is the condition;therefore, the criminal type of negligent joint crime is rejected;if it is considered that the instigator and the instigated The act constitutes a negligent offense, and it is questionable whether the simple abetting act has the nature of a negligent offense. At the legislative level, whether it is a joint crime or an instigator provision, they have set up certain obstacles for punishing "instigating" others for violating the duty of care. Examining foreign legislation and regulations, we should amend our country’s legislation on joint crimes to remove obstacles to the punishment of negligent joint crimes.

关 键 词：风险 教唆犯 可罚性 注意义务 过失共同犯罪 

分 类 号：D914[政治法律—刑法学]