STS的研究主题——基于贝尔纳奖获得者共被引分析  

The Academic Subjects of STS: Based on Author Co-Citation Analysis of Bernal Prize Recipients

作　　者：李淑敏 李正风 LI Shumin;LI Zhengfeng(Jiangsu Research Base of Modem Information Society,Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications,Nanjing 210023,China;School of Marxism,Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications,Nanjing 210023,China;School of Humanities and Social Science,University of Science and Technology of China,Hefei 230026,China;School of Social Science,Tsinghua University,Beijing 100084,China)

机构地区：[1]南京邮电大学江苏现代信息社会研究基地,南京210023 [2]南京邮电大学马克思主义学院,南京210023 [3]中国科学技术大学人文与社会科学学院,合肥230026 [4]清华大学社会科学学院,北京100084

出　　处：《科学学与科学技术管理》2021年第8期3-16,共14页Science of Science and Management of S.& T.

基　　金：国家社会科学基金青年项目(17CSH065)。

摘　　要：基于对贝尔纳奖获得者作共被引分析所得出的7大子群:SSK的微观进路、科学体制社会学、争论与风险研究、技术论、科学技术的女性主义研究、SSK的宏观进路及科学史,结合学科背景与获奖者个人的基本学术情况,试图理清STS研究的主题,展示以贝尔纳奖获得者为代表的STS领域的宏观图景。Based on the author co-citation analysis of Bernal Prize recipients, using the Pro Quest platform which covering a wide range of cited literatures types as the database, excluding highly reviewed dissertations and books to calculate only academic journal papers in citing literatures, and to identify the research topics and cluster distribution in the field of STS represented by the Bernal Prize recipients. Seven academic subgroups have been got: micro-level approach of SSK, institutional sociology of science, technology studies, controversy and risk studies, feminist studies of science and technology,macro-level approach of SSK, and history of science. Their contribution rate in the factor analysis, in turn, is: 22.368%,12.777%, 10.841%, 10.822%, 8.879% 、8.424%, 5.942%. Compared with the calculation of the full citing literatures, the situation scholars across multiple subgroups is reduced, and the fields scholars belong are more clear, but there are still many scholars who are reflected in multiple subgroups, and there is cross-penetration between subgroups, the subgroup feminist studies of science and technology in which the ratio of journal papers to dissertations decreased significantly compared with the other six academic subgroups dropped from the second largest academic subgroup to the fifth largest academic subgroup.Combined with the subject background and academic contribution of the recipients, the macro picture of STS field represented by Bernard Prize recipients has been shown. Subgroup 1, micro-level approach of SSK, it mainly includes eight scholars: Suchman, Latour, Cetina, Lynch, Law, Woolgar, Callon, Mac Kenzie. Most of them majored in sociology and anthropology or were trained in it. Micro research methods such as ethnography, ethnomethodology and Actor Network Theory are used. Most of them have done laboratory research. There are also some other recipients represented in this subgroup 2, institutional sociology of science, it mainly includes 5 scholars: Merton, Price, Ben-David, Barber, Kuhn.

关 键 词：STS 研究主题 贝尔纳奖 作者共被引分析 

分 类 号：G301[文化科学]