检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:汤振宇 TANG Zhen-yu(College of Information Management,Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics,Nanchang 330013,Jiangxi,China)
机构地区:[1]江西财经大学信息管理学院,江西南昌330013
出 处:《铜业工程》2021年第4期6-10,共5页Copper Engineering
摘 要:伴随着产业升级和时代变迁,大宗商品的价格变动更加剧烈,相关行业的价格风险也日益凸显。随着金融及其衍生品的飞速发展,套期保值成为相关企业规避风险的重要途径。但是,套期保值的低有效率,一直是制约相关企业运用套期保值规避风险的重要因素。因此,本文对比了目前学术界和商业界常用的几个模型,试图通过实证的方式,找出适合铜期货的套期保值比率最优模型。经过检测,考虑了时间序列间协整关系的ECM模型能够较好地测算套期保值比率。With industrial upgrading and change of times,the price of bulk commodities changes more and more frequently,and the operational risk of related industries is also increasingly prominent.With the rapid development of finance and derivatives,hedging has become an important way for related enterprises to avoid risks.However,the low efficiency of hedging becomes an important factor restricting related enterprises to use hedging to avoid risks.Therefore,this paper compares several models commonly used in academic and commercial circles,and tries to find a suitable hedging model for copper futures through empirical method.After testing,the ECM model considering the cointegration relationship between time series can better measure hedging ratio.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117