“民本思想”研究的鉴戒和启示——关于构建逻辑自洽的学术概念体系的思考  

The Warning and Enlightenment on the Study of “People-Oriented Thought”——Reflections on the Construction of a Logically Consistent Academic Conceptual System

作　　者：张分田[1] ZHANG Fentian

机构地区：[1]南开大学历史学院,天津300071

出　　处：《天津师范大学学报（社会科学版）》2021年第4期117-122,共6页Journal of Tianjin Normal University(Social Science)

摘　　要：中国现代学术界的"民本思想"研究提供的鉴戒可以概括为:关注了一个极为重要的研究对象,开创了一个极为重要的问题研究,创造了一个颇有创意的学术概念,却因为学术概念的定义存在逻辑缺陷而误导了整个中国学术界,就连首创这个学术概念的梁启超本人也自己误导了自己的认识和判断,从而使一个极为重要的问题研究整体性地步入了误区,导致中国学术界对极其重要的历史现象作出了集体性的重大历史事实误判,进而误导了全国人民的历史认识。其最严重的学术后果和政治后果是:导致"现代新儒家"的错误的学术观点广为流行,致使"现代新儒家"的荒谬政治主张有机可乘。这个惨痛的教训提示我们:学术研究必须致力于构建逻辑自洽的学术概念体系。The warning provided by the study of “people-oriented thought” in modern Chinese academia can be summarized as follows:focusing on an extremely important research object,starting a very important research study and creating a highly creative academic concept. But due to the flaws in the logical definition of the academic concept,it mislead the Chinese academic circles. Even the pioneer of the academic concept himself,Liang Qichao,was misled by his own understanding and judgment,so that an extremely important research study was misled to a wrong direction. As a result,the Chinese academic circle has made a collective misjudgment on the important historical phenomenon,and thus misled the historical understanding of the whole nation. Its most serious academic and political consequence is that it leads to the widespread popularity of the wrong academic views of “Contemporary NeoConfucianism” and opens the way for the absurd political views of “Contemporary NeoConfucianism”. This painful lesson reminds us that academic research must be committed to building a logically consistent academic concept system.

关 键 词：学术概念 民本思想 统治思想 帝王观念 

分 类 号：D092[政治法律—政治学]