经桡动脉途径与股动脉途径介入治疗肺鳞癌的对比  

The Clinical Study of Bronchial Artery Infusion Chemotherapy via Radial Artery

作　　者：宋飞[1] 向盈盈[2] 张纪贵 车佳音 李林[1] 黄明[1] SONG Fei;XIANG Ying-ying;ZHANG Ji-gui;CHE Jia-yin;LI Lin;HUANG Ming(Dept.of Invasive Intervention,The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University(Yunnan Cancer Hospital),Kunming Yunnan,650118;Dept.of Stomatology,Yan’an Hospital,Kunming Yunnan,650051;Dept.of Radiology,Yanshan County Hospital,Wenshan Yunnan 663000,China)

机构地区：[1]昆明医科大学第三附属医院(云南省肿瘤医院)微创介入科,云南昆明650118 [2]昆明医科大学附属延安医院口腔科,云南昆明650051 [3]文山州砚山县医院放射科,云南文山663000

出　　处：《昆明医科大学学报》2021年第9期134-137,共4页Journal of Kunming Medical University

基　　金：国家自然科学基金资助项目(31860147);云南省科技厅-昆明医科大学应用基础研究联合专项基金资助项目2017FE467(-201)。

摘　　要：目的对比经桡动脉途径(TRA)和股动脉途径(TFA)对肺鳞癌患者行支气管动脉介入的可行性。方法选取122例肺鳞癌患者,采取经左侧桡动脉入路行支气管动脉介入治疗58例(行BAI患者47例,行BAE患者5例,行BACE患者6例),经股动脉入路行支气管动脉介入治疗64例(行BAI患者51例,行BAE患者10例,行BACE患者3例)。结果2种入路均成功实施经支气管动脉介入治疗,术后无明显并发症。经左侧桡动脉入路手术时间少于经股动脉入路。结论经桡动脉途径(TRA)行支气管动脉介入治疗是安全、快速和可行的,为肺部肿瘤介入提供更多可选择的介入路径。Objective To compare the feasibility of the bronchial artery intervention through the radial artery and femoral artery in patients with lung squamous cell carcinoma.Methods 58 patients with lung squamous cell carcinoma were treated with the bronchial artery intervention via left radial artery approach(47 patients with BAI,5 patients with BAE,6 patients with BACE)and 64 patients with bronchial artery intervention via femoral artery approach(51 patients with BAI,10 patients with BAE and 3 patients with BACE).Results Transbronchial artery interventional therapy was successfully performed in both approaches,and there were no obvious postoperative complications.The operation time of the left radial artery approach was less than that of the femoral artery approach.Conclusion The bronchial artery interventional therapy via radial artery is safe,rapid and feasible,which provides the more alternative interventional pathways for lung tumor intervention.

关 键 词：桡动脉 股动脉 肺癌 支气管动脉 

分 类 号：R730[医药卫生—肿瘤]