检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:GAO Fang
机构地区:[1]East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai,China
出 处:《US-China Law Review》2021年第4期182-190,共9页美中法律评论(英文版)
基 金:Funding:This study was funded by the overseas visiting program for Ph.D.candidate of East China University of Political Science and Law(Grant Number 172050039).
摘 要:The international community agrees on the need to combat domestic violence.To this end,different countries have attempted to draft legislation with varying degrees of success.Policing against domestic violence in the United States is implemented through multi-agency violence control,supported by improved comprehensive community-centered policing strategies.This could serve as a model for China in optimizing police intervention in the curbing of domestic violence.Ideological differences separate the Chinese and American police in their intervention approaches to domestic violence.These include differences in social interpretation of domestic violence,modes of intervention,law enforcement norms,and multi-agency cooperation.Chinese society needs to change its perception of domestic violence as a matter of family disputes,in the context of traditional family values.Instead,it should establish a modern sense of awareness regarding domestic violence and refine the procedures for police intervention.Ultimately,this will strengthen the role of the wider society in curtailing domestic violence.
关 键 词:domestic violence police intervention ARREST MEDIATE community collaboration
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15