盗窃网络虚拟财产行为的法益厘清  

Legal Benefit Clarification of the Theft of Online Virtual Property

作　　者：任跃进 童伟华[1] Ren Yuejin;Tong Weihua

机构地区：[1]海南大学法学院,海南海口570228

出　　处：《新疆社会科学》2021年第5期107-118,163,共13页Social Sciences in Xinjiang

基　　金：国家社科基金一般项目“刑法规范二重性视阈下存疑有利于被告人研究”(20FFXB71);海南省研究生创新科研项目“‘刑法解释限度’之‘文字可能的含义’如何得以‘可能’”(Hyb2019-24)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：网络虚拟财产已被《民法典》确认为新兴权利,《刑法》也应当部分承认虚拟财产属于盗窃罪需要保护的法益。虚拟财产既是盗窃罪的财产法益,又是非法获取计算机信息系统数据罪中的公共秩序法益,二者属于交叉型法条竞合关系,应根据数据的法益属性判定具体的罪名;具体法益数额的计算,用户、受害人主采市场价格法,在网络服务商受害人的案件中应主采违法所得法;此外应对盗窃网络虚拟财产案件普遍酌定从轻处罚。盗窃网络虚拟财产既遂的判断,应以“转移占有的完成”进行规范层面的阶层化二次判断,“控制说”、“失控说”或者“离账说”、“提现说”都是基于事实层面的解释,欠缺规范性。Network virtual property has been recognized by the Civil Code as an emerging right,and the Criminal Law should also partially recognize virtual property as a legal interest to be protec-ted by the crime of theft.Virtual property is not only the property legal benefit of the crime of theft,but also the public order legal benefit of the crime of illegal access to computer information system data,the two belong to the cross-competing relationship,and the specific crime should be de-termined according to the legal benefit properties of the data;the calculation of the amount of specif-ic legal benefit,users and victims should mainly adopt the market price method,and in the case of victims of network service providers should mainly adopt the illegal income method;in addition,the theft of network virtual property.In addition,we should adopt the law of illegal income in the case of network service provider victims.The judgment of attempted theft of network virtual property should be stratified secondary judgment at the normative level with the"completion of transfer of possession","control","out of control"or"out of account".The"control","out of control"or"out of account","withdrawing"are all fact-based explanations,lacking in normativity.

关 键 词：虚拟财产 法益 盗窃罪 非法获取计算机信息系统数据罪 既遂 占有 

分 类 号：D914.399[政治法律—刑法学]