检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李函颖[1] 李娜 Li Hanying;Li Na(School of Education,Huazhong University of Science&Technology,Wuhan 430074,China)
机构地区:[1]华中科技大学教育科学研究院,湖北武汉430074
出 处:《中国科技论坛》2021年第10期170-179,共10页Forum on Science and Technology in China
基 金:全国教育科学规划国家青年课题“一流大学境外专任教师引入与管理的国际经验与本土实践”(CDA190259)。
摘 要:本研究从审查前期教育与培训、申请时的材料审核与评估、申请后的过程监管三阶段考察美国大学科研立项的准入制度,总结出其蕴含法律条例护航、经济杠杆助推、第三方参与、专业人士保障等诸多成功经验,同时也面临自身审批程序僵化、社科领域审查专业性不足、研究自由与科研伦理之间的矛盾、市场机制下商业科研审查机构对院校科研审查的冲击等一系列挑战,旨在为中国研究者从事实地调查以及科研管理机构进行制度完善提供相关经验。The study investigates the access system of scientific research projects in American universities from three approval processes:the education and training at the early stage of investigation,the application of materials audit and assessment,the process supervision after application.It points out the successful experience of the system,such as escalation of legal regulations,economic leverage,third party participation and professional protection.However,the system also faces lots of challenges.For example,the rigidity of the approval process,lack of professional in the field of social sciences review,the contradiction between research freedom and scientific research ethics,the impact of commercial research review agencies on university research review under the market mechanism and so on.This study is designed to provide relevant experience in field survey for researchers and the institutional improvement for scientific research review institutions in China.
分 类 号:G649[文化科学—高等教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.15.221.165