“风格”批评的流衍与中国词学的现代转型  

The Evolution of “Style” Criticism and Modern Transformation of Ci Studies

作　　者：孙启洲 SUN Qizhou(School of Humanities and Social Science,Xi'an Jiaotong University,Xi'an,Shaanxi,710079.)

机构地区：[1]西安交通大学人文社会科学学院中文系,陕西西安710049

出　　处：《安徽大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2021年第5期83-91,共9页Journal of Anhui University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金青年项目“抗战大后方经济生活与文学书写研究”(20CZW040);中央高校基本科研业务费项目“文学制度视域下中国词学的现代转型研究”(SK2021025)。

摘　　要：古典词学传统中的“风格”,主要指向词人创作风貌的静态描述和笼统概括,并以诗教传统中的“雅正”之风为尚。晚近以来,随着西方风格学知识的传入及其在文学批评中的普遍运用,“风格”也逐渐成为词学核心话语。胡适和胡云翼将词学“境界”说导向“风格”论,引领新的词学批评潮流。此后,龙榆生的词风流变论,对于词派乃至词的时代风格演变过程的研究,使现代词学风格论渐趋成熟。詹安泰立足于文学本位,以修辞学的视域划分词体风格的多样形态,丰富了词学风格论体系的内涵。“风格”一词在词学批评中的流衍,足可视为词学发展史的缩影,是观照词学现代转型的重要路径之一。“Style”in the tradition of classical ci studies mainly refers to the static description and generalization of the features of poets creation,with“yazheng”(雅正)style in the tradition of poetry teaching as the principle.After the introduction of western stylistic knowledge and its widespread application in literary criticism,“style”has gradually become the core discourse of ci studies in modern times.Hu Shi and Hu Yunyi set a new trend of ci criticism by shifting from“jingjie”to“style”.Afterwards,Long Yusheng made“style”criticism more mature by analyzing the changes in the style of ci-poets and the evolution of the style of ci poetry.Zhan Antai enriched the connotation of“style”criticism,by classifying the various forms of ci style from the perspective of rhetoric primarily on the basis of literary standards.The spread of the word“style”in ci criticism was the epitome in the development of ci studies and one of the important ways to observe its modern transformation.

关 键 词：风格 词体 中国词学 现代转型 

分 类 号：I052[文学—文学理论]