检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:Guo Zhiyuan 郭志媛(China University of Political Science and Law)
机构地区:[1]China University of Political Science and Law
出 处:《China Legal Science》2021年第5期3-29,共27页中国法学(英文版)
基 金:supported by the ’Scientific Research and Innovation Grant’ of China University of Political Science and Law (19ZFG82004);by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
摘 要:Four decades had elapsed since the first Criminal Procedure Law was enacted in China.During the past forty years,Chinese Criminal Procedure Law went through several rounds of revisions.This paper examines Chinas criminal procedure law reforms from a historical perspective.By looking back to the amendments to the Criminal Procedure Law,this paper analyzes the backgrounds and specific reasons why each amendment to the Criminal Procedure Law carries different characteristics.The first amendment was idealistic because it was dominated by legal scholars and primarily based on comparative study.In contrast,the subsequent amendment became more pragmatic because it was conducted by legal professionals and has drawn lessons from the first-round reform and utilized empirical study and pilot projects in the legislative process.中国颁布第一部刑事诉讼法典已逾四十载,其间经历了数次修订。本文尝试从历史视角探讨中国的刑事诉讼改革,通过回顾刑事诉讼法修改,分析每一轮改革的背景并探讨其各具特色的深层原因。刑诉法首次修改过于理想主义,其原因在于这次改革是由学者主导且主要是在比较法研究基础上进行的法律移植。相比之下,随后的刑诉法修改更为务实,因为它是由法律从业人员主导的改革,并且吸取了第一轮刑诉法修改的教训,在立法过程中采用了实证研究和试点项目。
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.219.115.102