全瓷全冠与全瓷高嵌体修复后牙牙体缺损的临床效果对比  

Comparison of the Clinical Effects of All Ceramic Crown and All Ceramic Inlay in the Restoration of Posterior Tooth Defects

作　　者：张璐璐 ZHANG Lu-lu(Department of Stomatology,Kangping County People’s Hospital,Shenyang City,Liaoning Shenyang 110500)

机构地区：[1]沈阳市康平县人民医院口腔科,辽宁沈阳110500

出　　处：《中国医疗器械信息》2021年第17期149-150,共2页China Medical Device Information

摘　　要：目的:比较全瓷全冠与全瓷高嵌体修复后牙牙体缺损的临床效果。方法:选择2017年1月~2019年9月康平县人民医院收治的88例后牙牙体缺损患者为研究对象,依据随机数字表法,将研究对象分为对照组与观察组(每组44例),对照组给予全瓷全冠修复治疗,观察组给予全瓷高嵌体修复治疗,比较两组患者的修复效果和不良事件发生情况。结果:观察组患者的修复总有效率为97.73%,高于对照组(84.09%),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组预后不良事件发生率为2.27%,显著低于对照组(13.64%),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:在后牙牙体缺损患者治疗中,全瓷高嵌体修复较全瓷全冠修复效果更为理想,且预后恢复质量更高。Objective:To compare the clinical effect of all ceramic crown and all ceramic high inlay in the restoration of tooth defects.Methods:A total of 88 patients with posterior tooth defects admitted to Kangping County People’s Hospital from January 2017 to September 2019 were selected as the research objects.According to the random number table method,the research objects were randomly divided into two groups:the control group and the experimental group(44 cases in each group).The control group was treated with all ceramic crown restoration,and the experimental group was treated with all ceramic high inlay restoration.The repair effect and adverse events of the two groups were compared.Results:The total effective rate of repair in the observation group was 97.73%,which was higher than that of the control group(84.09%),and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05);the incidence of adverse prognostic events in the observation group was 2.27%,which was significantly lower than the control group(13.64%),the difference is statistically significant(P<0.05)Conclusion:In the treatment of posterior teeth defect,all ceramic high inlay restoration is better than all ceramic full crown restoration,and the quality of prognosis is higher.

关 键 词：后牙牙体缺损 修复治疗 全瓷全冠 全瓷高嵌体 崩瓷 脱落 继发龋齿 

分 类 号：R783.3[医药卫生—口腔医学]