期待可能性理论在刑事审判中的应用研究——以412份刑事裁判文书为样本  

Applicative Research of Theory of Expectant Possibility in Criminal Trial--Taking 412 Criminal Judicial Documents as Samples

作　　者：翟宇航 ZHAI Yuhang(Law School,Shandong University,Weihai,Shandong,264209,China)

机构地区：[1]山东大学法学院,山东威海264209

出　　处：《西安石油大学学报（社会科学版）》2021年第5期93-100,共8页Journal of Xi’an Shiyou University:Social Science Edition

基　　金：山东省社会科学规划研究重点项目“认罪认罚从宽司法改革疑难问题研究”(18BFXJ04)。

摘　　要：期待可能性是规范责任论中最为核心和关键的要素。实证分析表明,在我国,期待可能性理论正逐渐得到司法实务的认可。当然,期待可能性多由辩护方提出,其被法庭所认可的比例较低。司法实务人员在运用期待可能性理论作为出罪或罪轻事由时,存在着适用标准较低和与刑法中其他理论混同等误区与不足。因此正确适用期待可能性需要明确个罪的犯罪构成要件,正确认知每个刑法规范背后所保护的法益,厘清刑法罪数问题以及合理判断适用标准。Expectation possibility is the core and key element of normative responsibility theory.Empirical analysis shows that in China,the theory of expectation possibility is gradually recognized by the judicial practice department.The current overall situation is that the possibility of expectation is mostly raised by the defense,and the proportion recognized by the court is relatively low.There are some misunderstandings and deficiencies in the application of the theory of expectant possibility as the cause of crime or light crime,such as the lower applicable standard and the confusion with other theories in criminal law.In judicial practice,it is necessary to make clear the constitutive requirements of individual crimes,correctly recognize the legal interests protected behind each criminal law norm,clarify the number of crimes in criminal law and reasonably judge the applicable standards.

关 键 词：期待可能性 规范责任论 责任阻却事由 

分 类 号：D924.1[政治法律—刑法学]