关于因明学“再决识”不同观点的比较研究  

A Comparative Study Of The Different Viewpoints About Subsequent Cognition In The Buddhistic Logic

作　　者：切穷加 Chos-skyong-rgyal

机构地区：[1]青海民族大学藏学院

出　　处：《攀登（藏文版）》2021年第3期70-78,共9页

摘　　要：本文以陈那的集量论和法称的释量论为“再决识”的根本出处,“再决识”是否为现识、有无分别之心、以及“再决识”分类等方面,分别形成以萨迦班智达和宗喀巴大师的两种不同观点。这两种观点主要从“再决识”是否真实和理性作为判断依据。对以上几位大师的各种论证方式、逻辑结构等进行了研究和探讨。Dignaga’s《tshad-ma-rig-bai-mdo》and Dharmakirti’s《tshad-ma-rnam-’grel》are the fundamental sources of“Subsequent Cognition”.In terms of whether“Subsequent Cognition”is present knowledge,whether there is a heart of distinction,and its classification,two different views are formed respectively,represented by Sakya Bandita and Tsongkhapa.These two views are mainly based on whether the“Subsequent Cognition”is true and rational.This paper studies and discusses the various argumentative methods and logical structures of some masters.

关 键 词：再决识 观点 分类 比较 

分 类 号：G63[文化科学—教育学]