东汉思想家赋学批评的文学史意义——以桓谭、王充与王符为例  

The literary historical significance of Fu criticism by thinkers in the Eastern Han Dynasty——Take Huan Tan,Wang Chong and Wang Fu as examples

作　　者：冷卫国[1] Leng Weiguo(Capital Normal University,Beijing 100089,China)

机构地区：[1]首都师范大学文学院,北京100089

出　　处：《河南师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2021年第5期110-115,共6页Journal of Henan Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)

摘　　要：桓谭、王充与王符是东汉时期的三大思想家,他们生活的时代前后相继,贯穿了东汉王朝的始终。从赋学批评的主体来看,东汉的赋学批评主要分为辞赋家和思想者两大类。桓谭、王充与王符的赋学批评,反映的是后一类群体的辞赋观念。“赋言志”构成了东汉思想家赋学批评的思想主线,也与东汉辞赋的创作实际相契合。梳理他们的赋学批评,有助于把握东汉赋学批评的历史轨迹,进而理解建安文学风格的形成。Huan Tan,Wang Chong and Wang Fu were three great thinkers in the Eastern Han Dynasty.They lived in successive times,throughout the Eastern Han Dynasty.From the perspective of the main subject of Fu criticism,Fu criticism in the Eastern Han Dynasty is mainly divided into two categories:Ci Fu Writers and thinkers.The Fu criticism of Huan Tan,Wang Chong and Wang Fu reflects the concept of Ci Fu of the latter group.“Fu expresses ambition”constitutes the ideological main line of Fu academic criticism of thinkers in the Eastern Han Dynasty,and it is also consistent with the creative practice of Ci Fu in the Eastern Han Dynasty.Combing their Fu criticism will help to grasp the historical track of Fu criticism in the Eastern Han Dynasty,and then understand the formation of Jian’an literary style.

关 键 词：桓谭 王充 王符 赋学批评 东汉 

分 类 号：I206.342[文学—中国文学]