“破名者的姿态”--评金理《文学史视野中的现代名教批判:以章太炎、鲁迅与胡风为中心》  

“The Posture of Ethical Order Breakers”:On Jin Li’s Criticism of Modern Ethical Order from the Perspective of Literary History:Centering on Zhang Taiyan,Lu Xun and Hu Feng

作　　者：何亦聪[1] HE Yicong(School of Chinese Language and Literature,Shanxi University,Taiyuan 030031,China)

机构地区：[1]山西大学文学院,山西太原030031

出　　处：《苏州教育学院学报》2021年第4期34-37,共4页Journal of Suzhou College of Education

摘　　要：中国近世文化的一个痼疾是名与实的高度分离,新文化运动以后,此种痼疾并未消失,反而与新的文化资源、社会思潮结合产生了“现代名教”。金理的《文学史视野中的现代名教批判:以章太炎、鲁迅与胡风为中心》以章太炎、鲁迅、胡风、胡适为中心,就他们对现代名教的批判展开研究,一方面立足文学史视野对现代思想史进行反观,另一方面也是站在现代思想史的角度提示我们现代文学的读法。A chronic disease of Chinese modern culture is the high separation of name and reality.After the New Culture Movement,this chronic disease did not disappear,but mingled with new cultural resources and social thoughts,resulting in“modern ethical order”.Jin Li’s Criticism of Modern Ethical Order from the Perspective of Literary History:Centering on Zhang Taiyan,Lu Xun and Hu Feng focuses on Zhang Taiyan,Lu Xun,Hu Feng and Hu Shi’s criticism of modern ethical order.For one thing,it reflects on the history of modern thoughts from the perspective of literary history.Meanwhile,it also reminds us of the interpretation method of modern literature from the perspective of the history of modern thoughts.

关 键 词：金理 《文学史视野中的现代名教批判:以章太炎、鲁迅与胡风为中心》 现代名教 “名” 章太炎 鲁迅 胡风 胡适 文学史 思想史 

分 类 号：I206.6[文学—中国文学]