检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:何毅 李东卫 HE Yi;LI Dong-wei(POWERCHINA SINOHYDRO ENGINEERING BUREAU 14 CO.,LTD.,Kunming 650041,China)
机构地区:[1]中国水利水电第十四工程局有限公司,云南昆明650041
出 处:《云南水力发电》2021年第10期128-134,共7页Yunnan Water Power
摘 要:广东梅州抽水蓄能电站一期上、下库闸门井井深62.872m和59.404m,开挖断面均为7.9m×13.6m矩形。总结竖井开挖的一般方法,对比分析了大断面浅竖井开挖中一次扩挖法和二次扩挖法这两种方法的异同,通过对梅蓄上、下库闸门井开挖方法的针对性剖析,总结了浅竖井开挖中两种方法的优势与不足,且建议选择全断面一次扩控法,以保证工期和节约成本。In Phase I of Meizhou Pumped Storage Power Station,the depth of the upper and lower reservoir gate wells is 62.872m and 59.404m,and the excavation section is 7.9m×13.6m rectangular.This paper summarizes the general methods of shaft excavation,compares and analyses the similarities and differences between the primary expansion method and the secondary expansion method in shallow shaft excavation of large section.Through pertinent analysis of excavation methods for upper and lower reservoir gate shafts of Meizhou Pumped Storage Power Station,the advantages and disadvantages of the two methods in shallow shaft excavation are summarized,and it is recommended to select full-section one-time extended control method to guarantee construction period and save cost.
关 键 词:梅蓄电站 上下库闸门井 爆破开挖 方法比选 浅竖井
分 类 号:TV554.1[水利工程—水利水电工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3