域外内陆亚洲史学术理路的新阐释——钟焓《重释内亚史》伸论  

A New Interpretation of Foreign Methodologies in Inner Asian History Studies:A Review of Zhong Han’s Reinterpreting Inner Asian History

作　　者：李鸿宾[1] Li Hongbin

机构地区：[1]中央民族大学历史文化学院

出　　处：《中国边疆史地研究》2021年第3期199-212,F0003,共15页China's Borderland History and Geography Studies

基　　金：2018年度国家社会科学基金项目“唐后期河朔军镇胡汉员属本土化现象研究”(18BZS049)研究成果之一。

摘　　要：聚焦于钟书列举的域外六位学者有关"内亚史"研究的理路,以伯希和、塞诺和傅礼初治学手段与方法为例,指明该书阐析上述学者治学要旨的兴趣动机和学理依凭。伯希和兼治汉学、阿尔泰学,专精考证,构成自洽的学术体系,为钟焓所倾羡,亦与钟氏本人之学业旨趣相契合。塞诺尤其傅礼初继承伯氏之衣钵,又采纳社会科学方法对"内亚史"进行改造与拓展,所呈现的通达与博大,钟书也从20世纪学术范式转型的背景中给予肯定。钟书从方法论和逻辑思路等层面进行的新阐释,反映出中国大陆新生代学人文献处置手段的多样化及其眼界拓展的新气象。Focused on academic methodologies to study the Inner Asian history from the six foreign scholars introduced in Zhong’s book,the article with Paul Pelliot,Denis Sinor,and Joseph F.Fletcher as example,analyzes their research methods to illustrate what interested Zhong in their studies and which academic grounds he is on.Pelliot’s expertise in both Sinology and Altaic studies,mixed with his meticulous textual research acumen,brought him to the top of Sinology in the West.It was the shared academic interest in research method that led to Zhong’s appreciation of Pelliot’s work.With the foundation set by Pelliot,Sinor and Fletcher extended and restructured the study of Inner Asian history with methods from social science studies.This also received high admiration and affirmation from Zhong in the context of research paradigm shift in the 20 th Century’s academia.Based on such concerns,it is fair to say that Zhong provided a new interpretation that allowed us to read the vast and rich work provide by Western scholars in Inner Asian history studies from a logical and methodological perspective.In addition,Zhong’s work is a reflection of the evolution of history studies in China toward a more diverse,open-minded direction in the wake of the 21th Century.

关 键 词：域外内陆亚洲史 学术理路 新阐释 延展式评议 

分 类 号：K3[历史地理—历史学]