国家工作人员骗取差旅费行为的定性研究  

Research on the Nature of the Conduct of A Public Servant of Fraudulently Obtaining Travel Expenses

作　　者：陈劲阳[1] CHEN Jinyang

机构地区：[1]吉林大学法学院,吉林长春130012

出　　处：《政治与法律》2021年第11期52-62,共11页Political Science and Law

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学研究一般项目“终身刑导入刑法衍生问题研究”(项目编号:19YJA820003)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：对于国家工作人员骗取差旅费行为的定性,我国刑法学界存在贪污说与诈骗说之争。赞成贪污说的观点肯定该行为利用了职务上的便利,但没有论证清楚其所利用的是何种职务上的便利。赞成诈骗说的观点否定该行为利用了职务上的便利,但是该观点混淆了职务犯罪与普通侵财犯罪的教义学界限。贪污罪中“利用职务上的便利”的本质是行使公共权力,国家工作人员骗取差旅费的行为,应定性为贪污罪,其所行使的公共权力是职务消费权,职务消费权属于衍生性的公共权力。As to the nature of conduct of a public servant of fraudulently obtaining travel expen-ses,there is a debate between the doctrine of corruption and the doctrine of fraud in the academia of criminal law in China.The opinion in favor of doctrine of corruption takes acknowledges that such conduct is carried out by taking advantage of the post but does not explain clearly what kind of ad-vantage of the post was taken of.The opinion in favor of doctrine of fraud denies that such conduct is carried out by taking advantage of the post,but does not see clear doctrinal boundary between the post-related crime and the ordinary property crime.The essence of"taking advantage of the post"in the crime of corruption is to wield public power,so the conduct of a public servant of fraudulent-ly obtaining travel expenses should be determined as the crime of corruption,in which the public power wielded is the post-based power of consumption,a kind of derivative public power.

关 键 词：差旅费 贪污罪 诈骗罪 职务便利 职务消费权 

分 类 号：DF625[政治法律—刑法学]