检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张毅[1] ZHANG Yi(Law School,Shanghai University of Finance and Economics,Shanghai 200433,China)
出 处:《北京理工大学学报(社会科学版)》2021年第6期151-160,共10页Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology:Social Sciences Edition
基 金:国家社会科学基金重大项目“当代中国公众共用物的良法善治研究”(13&ZD179)。
摘 要:个人主义方法论与整体主义方法论提供了认识公众共用物共享权的两种不同路径。个人主义方法论从微观角度分析个人的行为选择,认为共享权是“作为个体的公众”享有的个体性权利;整体主义方法论从宏观角度认识公众共用物的基本属性,认为共享权是“作为整体的公众”享有的整体性权利。公众共用物共享权主体的不特定性、开放性,客体的公共性、共享性表明它是一项新兴的非排他性权利。这一权利特性决定了应当综合运用两种方法论研究公众共用物共享权,其中,个人主义方法论体现在依据“生态人”假设、“请求权”理论与法律经济分析等方式研究共享权;整体主义方法论体现在对公众共用物的类型化研究与对共享权的综合化保护。综合运用两种方法论有利于了解个人在公众共用物中的具体需求以及借助个人权利体系予以保护,有利于从整体观、系统论的角度保障公众共用物的持续供给。There are two different paths for understanding the right to using commons:the individualist methodology and the holistic methodology.Individualist methodology stands on a micro perspective and believes that right to using commons is an individual right enjoyed by“the public as an individual”while the holistic methodology understands the basic attributes of commons from a macroscopic perspective and holds that the right to using commons is an integral right enjoyed by“the public as a whole”.The right to using commons is a new non-exclusive right determined by the non-specificity and openness of their subject and the publicity and sharing of their object.This characteristic of right determines that two methodologies should be used comprehensively to study“right to using commons”.In the research of right to using commons,the individualist methodology is embodied in the hypothesis of“ecological person”,claim-right theory,and legal and economic analysis while the holistic methodology is embodied in typification of commons and the comprehensive protection of right to using commons.The comprehensive application of the two methodologies is conducive to understanding the specific needs of individuals in commons and protecting them with the help of individual rights system,and to ensuring the sustainable supply of commons from the holistic and systematic perspective.
分 类 号:DF468[政治法律—环境与资源保护法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.70