检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张建伟[1] ZHANG Jianwei(School of Law,Tsinghua University,Beijing 100084,China)
机构地区:[1]清华大学法学院,北京100084
出 处:《浙江工商大学学报》2021年第5期43-55,共13页Journal of Zhejiang Gongshang University
基 金:2021年最高人民检察院检察应用理论研究课题“量刑建设实务问题研究”(经费资助课题——编号07)。
摘 要:司法智能化,诸如数字技术的司法应用,具有两面性。在我国,相关问题的研究主要着眼于网络犯罪领域如何利用科技手段打击犯罪,对于政府权力的限制及其相关的法律的正当程序问题,研究与讨论尚不够充分。可以从两个方面探讨司法的科技应用,特别是大数据司法应用涉及的两个维度问题,一是犯罪控制维度,二是正当程序维度,它们在各自含义中体现了实体正义和程序正义的观念。通过对司法技术性问题进行分析,发现我国法院和检察院作为司法机关,对于侦查权的司法控制还有很大的拓展空间,大数据应用为司法机关加强对侦查权的控制提供了新的契机。The judicial application of big data has two sides.The researches on relevant issues in China mainly focus on how to use scientific and technological means to combat crimes in the field of cyber-crime.There are few researches and discussions on the limitation of government power and the related legal due process.This paper attempts to discuss the two dimensions involved in the judicial application of big data from two aspects:one is the dimension of crime control,the other is the latitude of due process.Both of them reflect the concept of justice in their respective meanings.The author analyzes relevant judicial technical issues,in the meantime,points out that as judicial authorities in China,courts and procuratorates still have a lot of room to expand the judicial control of investigation power,and the application of big data provides a new opportunity for judicial authorities to strengthen the control of investigation power.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49