刑事庭审辩论话语中控辩双方的时空体建构与叙事对抗——以张扣扣杀人案庭审辩论话语为例  

Narrative Confrontations Between the Prosecutor and the Defense Lawyer in Terms of Chronotope Construction in Criminal Argument Discourse:Taking the Argument Discourse in Zhang Koukou’s Case Trial as an Example

作　　者：马泽军[1] 杜雨霏 MA Zejun;DU Yufei(School of Foreign Languages,Dalian University of Technology,Dalian 116000,China)

机构地区：[1]大连理工大学外国语学院,辽宁大连116000

出　　处：《浙江外国语学院学报》2021年第3期35-42,共8页Journal of Zhejiang International Studies University

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目“中国当代庭审转述话语的多声源特征、功能及语用阐释研究”(18BFX060)。

摘　　要：刑事审判的主要任务是查明案件事实,对案件作出裁判。然而,案件通常发生在过去,法官需要根据法律规范和庭审中控辩双方话语所构建的证据链条来判断出案件事实。控辩双方由于目的、立场、社会角色不同,会在不同的意识凸显下作出不同的语言选择。具体而言,在构建证据链条的叙事中,双方会建构不同的时空体,其叙事版本会有较大的差异,甚至出现叙事对抗。本文以张扣扣杀人案庭审辩论话语为例,借助KH Coder软件,根据控辩双方在庭审辩论阶段叙事中的词汇共现情况,分析双方在不同的意识凸显下所建构的时空体及其所要实现的叙事功能,阐释庭审中叙事对抗出现的过程,以期为司法实践提供帮助。In criminal trials,the judges shall ascertain the case facts and make their judgments.However,the case happened in the past,so judges need to deduce and determine the case facts,based on the legal norms and evidence chains constructed by the verbal narration and written evidence given by the prosecutor and the defense lawyer in court.Due to differences in their goals,positions and social roles,the two sides have different consciousness salience,and will accordingly make different language choices.To be specific,the two sides will construct different chronotope frameworks in their narrations to form evidence chains,which result in great narrative disparities and even confrontations.Taking the argument discourse in Zhang Koukou’s case trial as an example,this article analyzes the different chronotope frameworks constructed by the prosecutor and the defense lawyer and investigates their respective narrative functions based on co-occurrence networks of the words with the aid of the software KH Coder,hoping to reveal the narrative confrontations between the two sides and to make contributions to judicial practice.

关 键 词：意识凸显 时空体 叙事功能 叙事对抗 

分 类 号：H030[语言文字—语言学]