检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨在会 YANG Zai-hui(Civil and Commercial Law School,Southwest University of Political Science and Law,Chongqing 401120,China)
出 处:《医学与哲学》2021年第20期61-65,75,共6页Medicine and Philosophy
基 金:2020年国家社会科学基金西部项目(20XFX011)。
摘 要:基因信息系《民法典》规定的私密信息,其具备的“(非绝对)预测性”及“共享性”使其在侵权路径和责任模式上区别于其他私密信息,但理论及实务两界的忽视导致基因信息未得到应有的保护。《个人信息保护法》并未延续《民法典》的分类标准,故而厘清《民法典》与《个人信息保护法》关于基因信息救济思路的区别,是解决基因信息在不同社会梯度权益冲突的前提。具言之,私法上对基因信息的保护应通过“规制源头”及“矫治下游”来实现,结合科研、就业、保险等具体场景,界定基因信息收集使用的合理范围及合法披露的具体尺度。Gene information is private information stipulated in Civil Code of the People's Republic of China,and its"(non-absolute)predictive"and"sharing"natures make it different from other private information in infringement path and liability mode,but the neglect of theoretical and practice circles leads to undue protection of genetic information.Personal Information Protection Law of the People's Republic of China does not continue the classification standards of Civil Code of the People's Republic of China.Therefore,clarifying the difference between Civil Code of the People's Republic of China and Personal Information Protection Law of the People's Republic of China is the premise for solving the conflict of rights and interests of genetic information in different social gradients.Generally,the protection of gene information in private law should be realized by"regulating the source"and"correcting the downstream".Combined with specific scenarios such as scientific research,employment and insurance,it needs to define the reasonable scope of collection and use of gene information,and the specific scale of legal disclosure.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.219.89.207