广义重复诉讼禁止中的利益衡量  

The Interest Measurement in the Prohibition of Broad Repetitive Litigation

作　　者：史长青[1] SHI Chang-qing(School of Law,Shanghai University,Shanghai 200444,China)

机构地区：[1]上海大学法学院,上海200444

出　　处：《烟台大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2021年第6期23-35,共13页Journal of Yantai University(Philosophy and Social Science Edition)

基　　金：国家社科基金一般项目“重复诉讼识别中的利益衡量研究”(19BFX111)。

摘　　要：重复诉讼概念由狭义向广义扩张,已是各国民事司法的共识,但扩张的限度和正当性仍需解释。避免重复审理和矛盾裁判的目的解释,缺乏过程视角,应向过程与结果兼顾的利益解释转变。广义重复诉讼在何种程度上允许遮断不同的后诉,需根据利益调整原理在具体的利益对比关系中判断,亦即从制度利用者视角关注程序事实群,采用反形式逻辑的利益衡量方法,遵循避让原则、平衡原则、比例原则、补偿原则和诚实信用原则,在原被告利益、实体法利益、法院利益和社会公共利益之间作出选择。利益衡量论的解释功能,在请求权竞合、抗辩、连带之债以及部分请求等复杂重复诉讼场合得以有效发挥,既为重复诉讼裁量提供相对性尺度,又为裁判说理提供正当性依据。The concept of repetitive litigation has expanded from a narrow sense to a broad sense,which has been the consensus of civil justice in various countries,but the limits and legitimacy of the expansion remain to be explained.Lack a process perspective,the teleological interpretation of avoiding duplication of trial and contradictory refereeing should shift to an interest interpretation in which both process and result are considered.The extent to which broad repetitive litigation allows the blocking of different subsequent suits needs to be judged in the specific interest comparison relationship according to the principle of interest adjustment.The lineation and interpretation functions of interest measurement theory can be effectively performed in the occasions of complex repeated litigation such as concurrence of claims,affirmative defense,joint and several debts,and partial claim.It provides not only relative measures for the determination of repeated litigation,but also justification for referee reasoning.

关 键 词：广义重复诉讼禁止 利益解释 利益调整原理 利益衡量 

分 类 号：D915.18[政治法律—诉讼法学]