交往对话、文化转型与平行比较:巴赫金理论的中国接受  

Communicative Dialogue, Cultural Transformation and Parallel Comparison:Chinese Acceptance of Bakhtin’s Theory

作　　者：李松[1] Li Song

机构地区：[1]武汉大学文学院

出　　处：《中国比较文学》2021年第4期45-55,共11页Comparative Literature in China

基　　金：武汉大学人文社会科学青年学术团队发展计划“近现代东亚的作家流徙、文学越境与文化触变研究”(编号:1102-413100047)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：巴赫金理论为中西方文论之间的对话提供了丰富的思想资源,深刻地影响和改变了当代中国文学与文化批评的面貌。中国学者运用巴赫金理论阐释文学、文化以及社会问题,对文学理论的建构与批评实践的深化具有重要的思想史意义。巴赫金的复调理论、对话思想、狂欢化批评为中国文学与社会的转型提供了理论启迪,为新时代文论的未来发展提供了新的思路。学术界的本土化研究提供了创造性的思路与方法,可以概括为巴赫金理论中国接受的三种范式,即交往对话、文化转型与平行比较。Bakhtin’s theory has provided rich ideological resources for the dialogue between Chinese and Western literary theories and profoundly influenced and changed contemporary Chinese literature and cultural criticism discourse.Chinese scholars use Bakhtin ’s concept of criticism to explain literary texts and literary ideas,which is of great significance to the construction of literary critical discourse.Bakhtin ’s polyphonic criticism,dialogical criticism and carnival criticism innovate the discourse of literary criticism in the context of the transformation of Chinese literary ideas and critical discourse,and provide a new way of thinking for the reintegration of literary theory in the new era.The study of localization in academic circles provides scientific ideas and methods,which can be summarized into three forms of Bakhtin ’s reception in China,namely communication and dialogue,cultural transformation and parallel comparison.

关 键 词：巴赫金理论 交往对话 文化转型 平行比较 

分 类 号：I0[文学—文学理论]