检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:胡国栋[1] 罗章保 HU Guo-dong;LUO Zhang-bao(College of Business Administration,Dongbei University of Finance and Economics,Dalian,Liaoning,116025,China;Center for Management Philosophy and Organizational Ecosystem,Renmin University of China,Beijing,100871,China)
机构地区:[1]东北财经大学工商管理学院,辽宁大连116025 [2]中国人民大学企业管理哲学与组织生态研究中心,北京100871
出 处:《经济管理》2021年第10期42-61,共20页Business and Management Journal ( BMJ )
基 金:国家自然科学基金青年项目“《贞观政要》与领导纳谏行为:基于经典诠释的本土化理论建构”(71702024);中国博士后科学基金面上资助项目“儒家文化情境下领导纳谏行为的理论建构与实证研究”(2019M650266);国家社会科学基金一般项目“儒家伦理领导力的本土化构建研究”(17BZX110)。
摘 要:信任是网络组织的核心治理机制,在中国现代化转型和市场经济发展过程中,本土社会中的信任模式正在经历着人际性信任和制度性信任的分化甚至对抗,并对网络组织的治理造成了不利影响。这种分化实质上是由二者在治理规则上的差异而导致的一种学理上的分化,进而导致网络组织治理参与者在实践中的逻辑矛盾和心理困境。借鉴福柯微观权力的思想,本文把两种信任模式作为不同的规则系统统一于权力的建构和博弈过程之中,实现了两种信任模式在学理上的耦合。进而在信任耦合的基础上建构了独具中国特质的默契治理机制,并基于情理社会中的人际关系模式和社会交换法则,分析了这种机制的内涵、特性和运作过程。本文以微观权力理论透析人际性信任和制度性信任在中国网络组织治理中的耦合机理并提出更具本土契合性的默契治理机制,有助于从高情境化的中层理论层面为建构中国特色的组织理论开辟新的路径。Trust is the core governance mechanism of network organizations.Although scholars have done a lot of researches on the trust mechanism of network organization governance, the lack of unified classification standards leads to the lack of cultural connotation of trust.Firstly, from the perspective of social society, this study divides China’s network organization trust in the transitional period into two modes: institutional trust and interpersonal trust, and believes that the two trust modes essentially represent two different rule systems.The former is a formal rule system and the latter is an informal rule system.They are in trust logic, cultural origin There are many differences in trust structure.Moreover, due to the differences of rule systems, institutional trust and interpersonal trust are mostly in opposition in theoretical research.At present, most scholars adopt the "alternative" view, trying to choose one of the trust models as the dominant or even the only trust model of network organization governance to solve the problem of trust opposition.However, the analysis of this study finds that there is no substantive separation between the two kinds of trust in the governance practice of Chinese network organizations, and the differentiation in theory is inconsistent with the coupling and combination in practice.In order to realize the theoretical coupling of institutional trust and interpersonal trust, this study draws lessons from the micro power theory of Foucault and Friedberg, and unifies the two trust models in the construction and game of power.It is found that from the perspective of micro power, interpersonal trust and institutional trust are two rules that network nodes rely on for power construction and game in local order, and their coupling form is an aggregation curve that fluctuates up and down around aggregation norms, Under the "intervention" of discipline technology and self technology, they form a relationship model of mutual transformation and penetration.This study found that on the b
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3