流动人口与本地劳动力高等教育回报率差异研究  

The Difference of the Returns to Higher Education between Migrant Workers and Local Workers:From the Perspective of Urban Heterogeneity

作　　者：黄静[1] 祝梦迪 Huang Jing;Zhu Mengdi

机构地区：[1]上海师范大学商学院

出　　处：《中国人口科学》2021年第5期77-87,127,共12页Chinese Journal of Population Science

摘　　要：针对中国流动人口受教育程度明显提升的新特征,文章利用中国劳动力动态调查数据,研究流动人口与本地劳动力高等教育回报率的差异及在不同等级城市中的异质性。研究结果表明,流动人口的高等教育回报率高于本地劳动力,高等教育对流动人口的工资收入具有较强的提升作用,对流入一线和新一线城市、跨省流动及乡—城型流动人口的工资提升作用更强。接受过高等教育的流动人口具有明显的自我选择效应,有能力的个体流动到生产效率更高的一线和新一线城市的意愿更强,从而获得更高的教育回报率。文章认为,推进以人为本的城镇化应顺应人口流动规律,消除注重地域属性并与福利挂钩的区域分割制度,清除劳动力自由流动的障碍,促进人力资本的优化配置。In view of the new characteristics of China’s migrant population with higher education level,this paper uses the data of China’s Labor Dynamics Survey to analyze the difference of the return rate to higher education between migrant population and local labor,and to study the heterogeneity in different cities.The results show that migrant population has a higher rate of return to higher education than the local labor,and higher education plays a stronger role in improving the income of migrant population,especially in first-tier and new first-tier cities,and to inter-provincial and rural-urban migrant population.The migrant population with higher education has a significant self-selection effect,and individuals with more ability have a stronger willingness to move to the big cities with higher production efficiency,thus obtaining a higher rate of return to education.This paper argues that the promotion of people-oriented urbanization should comply with the law of population flow,eliminate systema tic regional division,remove the obstacles to free flow of labor,and promote the optimal allocation of human capital.

关 键 词：流动人口 高等教育回报率 城市异质性 户籍异质性 

分 类 号：G649.2[文化科学—高等教育学] F249.27[文化科学—教育学]