论1940—1970年代中国文学的性别批评范式  

On the Gender Criticism Paradigm of Chinese Literature from the 1940s to the 1970s

作　　者：张宇 ZHANG Yu(School of Humanities,Jiangnan University,Wuxi 214122,China)

机构地区：[1]江南大学人文学院,江苏无锡214122

出　　处：《山西大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2021年第6期19-26,共8页Journal of Shanxi University(Philosophy and Social Science Edition)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重点项目“中国新文学学术史研究”(20AZW015);江苏省高校哲学社会科学研究一般项目(2021SJA0886)。

摘　　要：从学术史角度来看,学界对1940—1970年代中国文学中的性别叙事,存在四种批评范式,分别是:1942—1976年的“阶级解放论范式”、1980年代的“自由主义女性主义范式”、1990年代的“后现代-历史主义范式”、新世纪以来的“本土-多元化范式”。这四种范式各自有其成就与偏失。审视其学术史脉络,不难发现这些范式存在着形象建构固化、研究格局狭窄、研究路径模式化等诸多问题。要破除当前的研究迷局,需要进行学术范式的更新,以本土化导向、跨学科方法、价值中立态度构建新的学术范式,还原妇女问题的复杂历史。From the perspective of academic history,the academia has formed four criticism paradigms in the gender narrative in Chinese literature from the 1940s to the 1970s.They were respectively the“class liberation paradigm”from 1942 to 1976,the“liberal feminism paradigm”in the 1980s,the“postmodern-historicism paradigm”in the 1990s,and the“localization-diversity paradigm”in the 21st century.These four paradigms have their own achievements and shortcomings.In examing the context of its academic history,it is not difficult to detect the research problems in these paradigms,such as stereotyped female image construction,narrow research pattern and fossilized research path.To get out of the current research plight,it is necessary to update the academic paradigm and construct a new one with localized orientation,interdisciplinary approach and neutrality stance,so as to restore the complex history of women′s issues.

关 键 词：1940—1970年代文学 性别批评 妇女问题 范式 

分 类 号：I206.7[文学—中国文学]