检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:余厚宏 YU Hou-hong(Administrative Law School,Southwest University of Political Science and Law,Chongqing 401120,China)
出 处:《医学与哲学》2021年第21期35-40,共6页Medicine and Philosophy
基 金:2020年国家社会科学基金西部项目(20XFX001);2019年西南政法大学研究生创新项目(XZ2019005)。
摘 要:我国目前对女性实施冻卵技术采取了主体限制。冻卵作为生育权实现之重要辅助手段,无论是其权利相关主张还是权利限制正当性证成都应当回到权利内部进行讨论。生育权内部结构决定了资格、权能和自由的限制就是对权利本身的限制,加之主体间平等性内在要求,现行限制规则无疑有碍女性生育权的完整性及其实现。生育权作为基本人权和人格权,其消极权利属性也不允许国家无理干涉。但是从人性可能引发的权利冲突之实际出发,共同体从集体善之公共利益角度考量,并以基本人权实现为最终目的,对单身女性冻卵进行限制具备正当性基础。Current regulations prohibit single woman from implementing egg freezing technology.This technology is an important auxiliary means to realize female reproductive rights.Both the claim of reproductive rights and the justification of the restriction of rights should be discussed inside the rights.The internal structure of reproductive right determines that the restriction of qualification,power and freedom is the restriction of the rights itself,considering the internal requirement of equality between subjects,so the current restriction rules hinder the integrity and realization of woman's reproductive rights.Moreover,as a basic human rights and personality rights,the negative nature of egg freezing does not allow unreasonable interference by the state.Considering the public interest of common good and the ultimate goal of basic human rights,the community has justified the restriction on egg freezing for single woman with legitimacy foundation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7