经历体助词“过”的产生年代及来源研究述评  

Re-discussion on the Time and Source of Chinese Experiential Auxiliary Word“Guo(过)”

作　　者：赵怡 蔡华祥 Zhao Yi;Cai Huaxiang(School of Humanities Institute,Jiangnan University,Wuxi 214122,China)

机构地区：[1]江南大学人文学院,江苏无锡214122

出　　处：《现代语文》2021年第9期35-39,共5页Modern Chinese

基　　金：江苏省高校哲学社会科学研究重大项目“江苏方言体标记的共时分布及历时演变研究”(2020SJZDA010);江苏省社会科学基金文脉专项项目“吴方言史”(19WMB084);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目“长江下游沿岸方言体标记的共时分布及历时演变研究”(JUSRP2001ZD);国家社会科学基金重大项目“苏皖鄂赣江淮官话与周边方言的接触与演变研究及数据库建设”(19ZDA307)。

摘　　要：汉语经历体助词“过”是何时产生和如何产生的,学界还没有定论。关于它的产生年代,主要有六朝、唐代、宋代三种观点,其中,“宋代说”更具有说服力。关于它的产生过程,现存观点主要分为两派。多数学者持单一语法化路径的“过1”说,杨永龙等学者则认为“过_(2)”是由“过”的第二条语法化路径“过_(02)”发展而来的。同时,学界对经历体的内涵、语法化的具体路径和判定标准等都持有不同的看法。Scholars have not formed a unified view on when and how the Chinese experiential auxiliary word“guo(过)”came into being.Regarding its generation time,although there are currently three views in academia,namely the Six Dynasties,Tang Dynasty,and Song Dynasty,only the third view is more convincing.Regarding its source,the existing opinions can be divided into two main categories.Most scholars support the view that“guo_(2)(过_(2))”is derived from“guo1(过_(1))”which takes the same grammatical path as it.However,scholars such as Yang Yonglong believe that“guo_(2)(过_(2))”comes from“guo0_(2)(过0_(2))”on the second grammaticalization path of“guo(过)”.Scholars have different opinions on the connotation of the experience aspect,the specific path of the grammaticalization and the criterion of judgment.

关 键 词：经历体 “过_(2)” 产生年代 来源 争议原因 

分 类 号：H146[语言文字—汉语]