检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:田冰[1] Tian Bing
机构地区:[1]河南省社会科学院历史与考古研究所,郑州450002
出 处:《中州学刊》2021年第11期130-134,共5页Academic Journal of Zhongzhou
基 金:河南省哲学社会科学规划项目“明代巡视制度与地方廉政建设研究”(2019BLS014);国家社会科学基金一般项目“清代北方地区的城乡关系研究”(17BZS136)。
摘 要:中国古代黄河治理思想有疏导思想、分流思想、合流思想、全流域治理思想等。以分流方法治理黄河的思想从先秦时代到明朝中期,经历了酝酿、提出、成熟和在实践中逐步完善的过程,明中后期,其弊端逐渐显露。合流思想在明朝中后期成为主导思想,但仅限于黄河下游的治理。长期存在的改道思想在实践中成少败多,因此,明代中后期,全流域治理思想开始萌芽,受到清人的重视,对之后的治河思想产生了重要影响。In ancient China,the Yellow River governance thoughts included dredging thought,diverting thought,confluence thought and whole basin governance thought.From pre-Qin period to the middle of Ming Dynasty,the thought of diverting method of Yellow River governance experienced a process of gestation,proposal,maturity and gradual improvement in practice.In the middle and late Ming Dynasty,its disadvantages gradually emerged.Confluence thought became the dominant thought in the middle and late Ming Dynasty,but it was limited to the governance of the lower Yellow River.Therefore,in the middle and late Ming Dynasty,the whole basin governance thought began to sprout and was attached importance to by the Qing Dynasty people,which had an important influence on the later river governance thought.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.43