现实矛盾视域下的辩证法辩护--论埃尔斯特对辩证法的分析性重塑  

The Defense of Dialectics from the Perspective of Real Contradictions:An Analysis of Elster's Analytical Remodeling of Dialectics

作　　者：赵楠楠 ZHAO Nannan(Department of Philosophy Teaching and Research,Party School of CPC Jiangsu Provincial Committee,Nanjing 210009,China)

机构地区：[1]中共江苏省委党校哲学教研部,南京210009

出　　处：《常熟理工学院学报》2021年第6期71-74,105,共5页Journal of Changshu Institute of Technology

基　　金：国家社科基金青年项目“社会悖境的逻辑机制与出路研究”(17CZX007)。

摘　　要：与多数分析马克思主义者不同,埃尔斯特并不拒斥辩证法。但是,埃尔斯特对待辩证法的态度遭致了许多学者的误解。事实上,埃尔斯特尽力去为辩证法辩护,他试图采取一种间接的辩护策略,利用形式语言对辩证法的合理内核进行分析性重建。在埃尔斯特的工作中,辩证法的辩护与现实矛盾理论浑然天成,他对多主体互动的辩证矛盾情境进行分析,以现实矛盾为中介,引入形式逻辑中的模态合成谬误,将辩证推理的一些典型范例重塑为形式化的论证,从而实现了对辩证法的分析性重塑。Unlike the majority of analytical Marxists,Elster does not reject dialectics.However,Elster's attitude towards dialectics has been misunderstood by some scholars.In fact,Elster tries to defend dialectics by attempting to adopt an indirect defense strategy and using the formal language to reconstruct the rational kernel of dialectics.Elster analyzes the dialectical contradictory situations of multi-agent interaction,and with real contradictions as the medium,he introduces the logical modal fallacy of composition and reconstructs some typical examples of dialectical reasoning as formal logical argumentation.Besides,Elster's effective use of modal fallacy of composition has enabled the analytical remodeling of dialectics.Therefore,it can be said that the dialectical defense and reality contradiction theory are totally natural in Elster's theory.

关 键 词：辩证法 模态合成谬误 现实矛盾 分析性重塑 

分 类 号：B5[哲学宗教—外国哲学]