诈骗罪的历史考察及其启示  

Historical Investigation of Fraud Crime and Its Inspiration

作　　者：付立庆[1] FU Liqing(Research Center of Criminal Law,Renmin University of China,Beijing,China,100872)

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学刑事法律科学研究中心,北京100872

出　　处：《贵州大学学报（社会科学版）》2021年第6期93-102,123,共11页Journal of Guizhou University(Social Sciences)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目“诈骗罪的构造及其展开研究”(20BFX064)。

摘　　要：在世界各国财产犯罪的规定中,都是先有盗窃罪后有诈骗罪,诈骗罪作为独立的财产犯罪,很大程度上是为了弥补处罚漏洞,将无法按照既有财产犯罪处理的行为赋予其刑事违法性。通过考察世界各国刑法规定诈骗罪的历史发现,诈骗罪既是欺诈犯罪,又是财产犯罪,且属于主动互动型的财产犯罪。把握这种犯罪类型特征,对于本罪的实质理解和限定性认定具有重要意义。In the property crime regulations of different countries,the crime of theft comes first and then the crime of fraud.As an independent property crime,the crime of fraud is largely to make up for loopholes in punishment by assigning criminal illegality to behaviors that cannot be dealt with in accordance with existing property crimes.The historical investigation of the criminal laws of countries shows that the crime of fraud is a crime of false pretense,a crime of property,and also an active and interactive property crime.Grasping the characteristics of this type is of great significance for the substantive understanding and limited determination of this crime.

关 键 词：欺诈犯罪 财产犯罪 诈骗罪 互动型犯罪 历史考察 

分 类 号：D625[政治法律—政治学]