检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:周振萍[1] 魏清风[1] 王乾沙 黄卓君 邱杨[1] ZHOU Zhen-ping;WEI Qing-feng;WANG Qian-sha;HUANG Zuo-jun;QIU Yang(Jiangxi Cancer Hospital,Nanchang,Jiangxi 330029)
出 处:《赣南医学院学报》2021年第11期1160-1163,1166,共5页JOURNAL OF GANNAN MEDICAL UNIVERSITY
基 金:江西省卫生计划生育委员会科技计划课题(20185382)。
摘 要:目的:编制肿瘤科护士灵性照护认知评价量表并验证其信效度。方法:采用文献研究法、半结构式访谈法、Delphi专家函询法形成初始量表。对南昌市3所和天津市1所三级甲等医院的301名肿瘤科护士进行问卷调查,测定灵性照护认知评价量表的信效度。结果:正式量表由3个维度24个条目组成,累积方差贡献率为71.862%。量表内容效度指数为0.917,各条目的内容效度指数为0.875~1.00。总量表Cronbach'sα系数为0.957,折半信度为0.905。结论:量表具有良好的信效度,可作为测评肿瘤科护士灵性照护认知水平的工具。Objective:To compile the cognitive evaluation scale of spiritual care for nurses in oncology department and verify its reliability and validity.Methods:The initial questionnaire was formed by literature research method,semistructured interview method and delphi expert correspondence method.A questionnaire survey was conducted among 301 oncology nurses in grade a class three hospitals(3 in Nanchang and 1 in Tianjin)to determine the reliability and validity of the cognitive evaluation scale for spiritual care.Results:The formal scale consisted of 24 items in 3 dimensions,and the cumulative variance contribution rate was 71.862%.The content validity index of the scale was 0.917,and the content validity index of each item was 0.875-1.00.The total scale Cronbach'sαcoefficient was 0.957,and the half-reliability was 0.905.Conclusion:The scale has good reliability and validity,and can be used as a tool to evaluate the cognitive level of spiritual care of oncology nurses.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38