个人信息保护救济机制的比较法分析与解释论展开  

The Remedy Mechanism of Personal Information Protection Comparative Perspective and Interpretative Analysis

作　　者：张陈果 Zhang Chen-guo

机构地区：[1]上海交通大学法学院 [2]德国法兰克福大学

出　　处：《苏州大学学报（法学版）》2021年第4期77-86,共10页Journal of Soochow University：Law Edition

摘　　要：为实现“主体性弱化”的个人信息之有效保护,有必要细化我国《个人信息保护法》上三种救济机制“投诉—个体诉讼—集体诉讼”较为粗疏的规定,吸取比较法营养服务于我国规范的解释适用。欧盟布鲁塞尔模式形成“行政监管—行业自律—集体诉讼”相互支持与补充的三阶模式。日本个人信息保护机制协同化改革体现对投诉、质询、调解等非诉纠纷解决程序机制的倚重。为填补损害、激励起诉,《个人信息保护法》第69条规定的损害赔偿请求应区分情形在个人信息保护公益诉讼中予以应用。应建立三阶投诉处理机制并发挥《个人信息保护法》第70条规定的社会组织在投诉程序和调解程序以及诉调对接中的功能,并建设多维并进的程序救济机制。To effectively protect personal information as a special right with the characteristics of weakening subjectivity,the three-step remedy mechanisms enshrined in the Chinese Personal Information Protection Law(CPIPL)need to be interpretated properly and constructed in more details considering the corresponding experience in the EU,Germany,and Japan from the perspective of comparative law,namely,the complaint/petition procedure-the individual litigation procedure-and the collective legal relief mechanism.The European Union Brussels mode forms the three-step mode consisting of the administrative regulation,self-discipline of the industry,as well as the collective litigations.The most recent reform of the personal information protection mechanism in Japan reflects the importance of the alternative dispute resolution mechanism.Claims of damage compensation could be filed even in the collective action regarding personal information protection,according to article 69 CPIPL,for the purpose of encouraging the filing of cases.A multi-level complaint/petition procedure should be developed whilst paving the way for the non-governmental organizations to fulfill the function of mediation and further ADR procedures,as well as to prepare for the class action.

关 键 词：个人信息保护 救济 非诉纠纷解决 集体诉讼 

分 类 号：D925.1[政治法律—诉讼法学]