对哈贝马斯“重建历史唯物主义”的再阐释——基于实践哲学视角  

Reinterpretation of Habermas’ “Reconstruction of Historical Materialism”——From the Perspective of Practical Philosophy

作　　者：齐勇 QI Yong(Harbin Engineering University)

机构地区：[1]哈尔滨工程大学人文与社会科学学院

出　　处：《华中科技大学学报（社会科学版）》2021年第6期1-7,136,共8页Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology(Social Science Edition)

基　　金：哈尔滨工程大学中央高校基本科研业务费项目(3072020CFJ1310);黑龙江省哲学社会科学规划项目“人类命运共同体的实践哲学意蕴研究”(19ZXB015)阶段性成果。

摘　　要：实践哲学视角才是哈贝马斯"重建历史唯物主义"方案的基本视角,这一视角的缺失导致很多误读或者肤浅的认识。从实践哲学视角阐发,可以解答哈贝马斯"重建"方案的根本问题,即他对马克思实践哲学"不满"的根源以及他"重建"历史唯物主义的依据。哈贝马斯的"不满"源于依据实践哲学古典传统,将马克思的"社会劳动"归为目的行为,进而批判历史唯物主义是"生产范式"的实践哲学。在实践哲学的语境下,剖析哈贝马斯对历史唯物主义"实践"概念的置换,进而推展到对其整个"重建历史唯物主义"方案的重新解读,既能清晰地呈现哈氏"重建"的致思逻辑,又能在批判的基础上凸显马克思实践哲学的真理价值。The perspective of practical philosophy is the basic perspective of Habermas’ plan of "reconstruction of historical materialism". The lack of this perspective leads to misreading or superficial understanding. From the perspective of practical philosophy, we can solve the fundamental problem of Habermas’ "reconstruction" plan, that is, the root of his "dissatisfaction" with Marxist practical philosophy and the basis of his "reconstruction" of historical materialism. Habermas’ "dissatisfaction" stems from the classification of Marx’s "social labor" as a purposive behavior according to the classical tradition of practical philosophy, and then historical materialism is criticized as a practical philosophy of "production paradigm". In the context of practical philosophy, this paper analyzes Habermas’ replacement of the concept of "practice" of historical materialism, and then extends to the reinterpretation of his whole plan of "reconstruction of historical materialism", which not only clearly presents the lead-to-thinking logic of "reconstruction of historical materialism" by Habermas, but also highlights the truth value of Marxist practical philosophy on the basis of criticism.

关 键 词：哈贝马斯 重建历史唯物主义 实践哲学 

分 类 号：B565.6[哲学宗教—外国哲学]