检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李晓艳 毛淑玲[2] Li Xiaoyan;Mao Shuling(Journal Editorial Department, Liaoning Normal University, Dalian 116029, China;School of Law, Liaoning Normal University, Dalian 116081, China)
机构地区:[1]辽宁师范大学学报编辑部,辽宁大连116029 [2]辽宁师范大学法学院,辽宁大连116081
出 处:《辽宁师范大学学报(社会科学版)》2021年第6期97-103,共7页Journal of Liaoning Normal University(Social Science Edition)
基 金:辽宁省社会科学规划基金项目“新《民事证据规定》与《民法典》中证据规范的回应与对接问题研究”(L20BFX001);辽宁省教育厅人文社会科学基础项目“民事证据规则适用问题研究——以《最高人民法院关于民事诉讼证据的若干规定(2019)》为中心”(WJ2020018)。
摘 要:大数据开创了新时代科学研究的新形式,对法官的思维和法院的工作产生了很大影响,既提供了机遇也带来了挑战。大数据促使法官的思维发生转变:由注重因果关系转向注重相关关系,由注重定性分析转向注重量化分析,由注重演绎推理转向注重概率与归纳方法的运用。大数据在推动法院审判与管理工作变革的同时,也给法院工作带来了挑战。大数据时代法官思维转变与法院工作应对之策是:法官应注重数据分析与客观实践的有机结合,整合与完善数据结论的证据规则体系;法院应加强信息系统的前瞻性开发与研判,应用大数据技术有效推进庭审实质化改革。Big data have created a new form of scientific research in a new era and exerted a great influence on the thinking of judges and the work of courts,providing both opportunities and challenges.Big data prompt judges to change their thinking:from focusing on causality to focusing on correlation,from focusing on qualitative analysis to focusing on quantitative analysis,and from focusing on deductive reasoning to focusing on the application of probability and induction methods.Big data not only promote the trial and management work of courts,but also bring challenges to the work of courts.In the era of big data,judges and courts should pay attention to the organic combination of data analysis and rational practice,integrate and perfect the evidence rule system of data conclusion,strengthen the forward-looking development and research and judgment of the court information system and effectively promote the substantive reform of court trial by using big data technology.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.149.230.234