检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:秦晓 QIN Xiao(Institute of Chinese Thought and Culture,Northwest University,Xi’an 710127,Shaanxi,China)
机构地区:[1]西北大学中国思想文化研究所,陕西西安710127
出 处:《安康学院学报》2021年第6期113-117,共5页Journal of Ankang University
摘 要:20世纪20年代在中国思想界出现的“科玄论战”涉及科学与人生观等诸多问题。“玄学派”认为科学不能解决人生观的问题,而“科学派”则认为科学可以解决人生观的问题,存在科学的人生观。而后兴起的马克思主义派对前两者都有一定程度的批判,论战中马克思主义得到了广泛传播。今天回顾这段历史,应该吸取和总结经验教训,全面辩证地看待科学与人文的关系,使科学精神与人文精神达到统一。The“scientific and metaphysical controversy”that emerged in the Chinese ideological circle in the 1920s involved many issues of science and outlook on life.The“metaphysical school”believed that science could not solve the problem of outlook on life,while the“scientific school”believed that science could solve the problem of outlook on life.There was a scientific outlook on life.The Marxist school that emerged later criticized the former two to a certain extent.In the controversy,Marxism has been widely spread.Looking back on this period of history today,we should learn and sum up experience and lessons,and look at the relationship between science and humanities in a comprehensive and dialectical way,so that the scientific spirit and humanistic spirit can be unified.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7