认罪认罚案件量刑冲突与矛盾调和  

Conflicts in Sentencing for Cases of Confessing Guilt and Accepting Punishment and Ways to Reconcile the Conflicts

作　　者：戴勇才 张驰 Dai Yongcai;Zhang Chi(Southwest University of Political Science and Law,Chongqing 401200,China;Tongxiang Municipal People's Court of Zhejiang Province,Tongxiang 314500,China)

机构地区：[1]西南政法大学法学院,重庆401200 [2]浙江省桐乡市人民法院,浙江桐乡314500

出　　处：《贵州警察学院学报》2021年第5期49-54,共6页Journal of Guizhou Police College

摘　　要：量刑协商在认罪认罚从宽制度中居于核心地位。在实践中,量刑建议对控、辩、审三方的拘束力存在争议,尤其是在量刑建议精准化的背景下该分歧越发明显,直接影响该制度的运行效果。应从公诉权与审判权优化配置方面,明确公诉权在认罪协商领域的主导作用,尤其是公诉权扩张的边界范围,真正构建精准化量刑建议对裁判结果拘束的诉讼规则。同时还需要完善配置制度,制定精准化量刑建议的细则指引,提高被追诉人协商地位,建立刑事案件审前处理的诉讼机制和法官多元化的审查方式。Sentencing consultation occupies the core position in the leniency system for confessing guilt and accepting punishment.In practice,there are controversies over sentencing suggestions’binding force on the parties of prosecution,defense and trial,and these controversies are getting particularly obvious in the context of accurate sentencing suggestions and thus directly affecting the operation effect of the system.It is proposed that,from the aspect of optimizing the allocation of the right of public prosecution and the judicial power,the leading role of the public prosecution power should be made clear in negotiation over confession of guilt,especially regarding the expansion boundary of the public prosecution power,and the litigation rules about the binding force of accurate sentencing suggestions on the judgment results should be actually constructed.At the same time,the allocation system needs to be improved,including formulating detailed guidelines for accurate sentencing suggestions,improving the negotiating status of the accused,establishing the litigation mechanism for the pre-trial handling of criminal cases and the judges’diversified review methods,etc.

关 键 词：认罪认罚 量刑权 精准化量刑建议 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]