法律实证研究视角下的仲裁法修订:共识与差异  

Revision of Arbitration Law from the Perspective of Empirical Legal Research:Consensus and Differences

作　　者：毛晓飞[1] Mao Xiaofei

机构地区：[1]中国社会科学院国际法研究所

出　　处：《国际法研究》2021年第6期110-126,共17页Chinese Review of International Law

基　　金：中国社会科学院“一带一路”法律风险防范与法律机制构建调研项目部分阶段性研究成果。

摘　　要：适逢《中华人民共和国仲裁法》酝酿重大修改,中国社会科学院国际法研究所、北京市法学会立法学研究会与中国仲裁法学研究会于2020年6月联合推出首份《仲裁专家意见调查问卷》,有效回收国内仲裁专家回复102份和国际仲裁专家回复6份。调查结果显示,在多个修法焦点议题上已形成显著的专家倾向性意见(超过三分之二的绝对多数),包括引入仲裁地概念、确立仲裁自裁管辖权等弥补现行法律不足的规定,同时亦在网上开庭与电子送达等"前瞻性"立法方面形成专家共识。值得注意的是,在纠纷可仲裁性以及临时仲裁合法化等问题上,国内专家意见与国外专家分歧显著,这表明立法需要在仲裁法律制度的国际化与本土适应性上作出适度平衡与合理安排。比照2021年7月30日司法部公布的《仲裁法(修订)(征求意见稿)》,多数条文修改与问卷调查反映的专家共识契合,但在电子仲裁协议、仲裁员任职资格以及仲裁员责任豁免等方面仍存差异。At a time when the Arbitration Law of the People’s Republic of China undergoes major amendments,the Institute of International Law of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences,the Legislative Studies Society of the Beijing Law Society,and China Academy of Arbitration Law jointly launched the first“Survey of Arbitration Experts’Opinions”in June 2020,with 102 responses from domestic arbitration experts,and 6 responses from international arbitration experts.The survey shows that a significant expert consensus(over two-thirds absolute majority)has emerged on several key issues for legislative amendments,including the introduction of the concept of the seat of arbitration and the establishment of competence-competence principle,as well as forward-looking legislation such as online hearings and electronic services.It is noteworthy that the majority opinion of domestic experts differs significantly from that of foreign experts on the scope of arbitration and the legalization of ad hoc arbitration,indicating that the legislative work needs to strike a proper balance between the internationalization and indigenization of the Chinese arbitral system with reasonable arrangements.Compared with the Arbitration Law of the People’s Republic of China(Draft for Comments)published by the Ministry of Justice on July 30,2021,most of the amendments are in line with the consensus of the experts reflected in the questionnaire,but there are still differences in the electronic arbitration agreement,the qualifications of arbitrators,and the arbitral immunity.

关 键 词：仲裁法 《仲裁法(修订)(征求意见稿)》 仲裁地 临时仲裁“双轨制” 电子仲裁协议 仲裁员责任豁免 

分 类 号：D925.7[政治法律—诉讼法学]