休闲、劳动及其关系--对鲍德里亚休闲观的批判  

Leisure,Labor and Their Relations:A Criticism of Baudrillard's View of Leisure

作　　者：孙煦扬 严耕[1] SUN Xu-yang;YAN Geng(Ecological Civilization Research Center,Beijing Forestry University,100083,P.R.China)

机构地区：[1]北京林业大学生态文明研究中心

出　　处：《北京林业大学学报（社会科学版）》2021年第4期45-49,共5页Journal of Beijing Forestry University ：Social Sciences

基　　金：教育部哲学社会科学发展报告建设项目“中国生态文明建设发展报告”(13JBG003)。

摘　　要：遵从西方传统休闲哲学的劳动-休闲二分模式,鲍德里亚将休闲界定为劳动以外的自由时间。在此基础上,他从消费社会的时间稀缺性出发,澄清了商品逻辑对劳动时间和休闲时间的同等支配,从而得出了休闲时间在事实上并不自由的结论,并由此陷入了对现代休闲的绝望之中。隐藏在这种悲观态度背后的是鲍德里亚对休闲和与之相对的劳动概念及两者之间关系的曲解。若要避免鲍德里亚式的休闲悲剧,则不仅需要在理论上正确认识劳动、休闲及其统一关系,更需要在实践中促成劳动与休闲的相互作用,实现二者的融合统一。Following the dichotomy of western traditional leisure philosophy,Baudrillard defined leisure as free time outside labor.On that basis,he clarified the equal domination of commodity logic over labor and leisure time from the time scarcity of consumer society.Then he came to the conclusion that in fact leisure time is not free,and thus fell into the despair to modern leisure.Behind this pessimistic attitude lies Baudrillard's misinterpretation of leisure,labor and the relationship between them.To avoid this tragedy of leisure it is not only necessary to correctly understand labor,leisure and their unified relations in theory,but also essential to facilitate the interaction of labor and leisure and to realize the integration of them in practice.

关 键 词：消费社会 休闲异化 鲍德里亚式休闲悲剧 劳动休闲化 休闲劳动化 

分 类 号：B821[哲学宗教—伦理学]