承继共同正犯修正肯定说之理论肯认及运用  

Theoretical Argumentation of Successive Accomplice Perpetrator and Justification of the Amendment Confirmed Theory

作　　者：梁萌瑜 童德华[1] Liang Mengyu;Dong Dehua(Criminal Justice School,Zhongnan University of Economics and Law,Wuhan 430073,Hubei,China)

机构地区：[1]中南财经政法大学刑事司法学院,湖北武汉430073

出　　处：《梧州学院学报》2021年第4期32-38,共7页Journal of Wuzhou University

摘　　要：承继共同正犯理论中,后行为人的归责问题,不但是刑法学界存在争议的重要问题,也是司法实务中的实际难题。对于后行为人是否应当归责,学界有着纯粹肯定说、纯粹否定说及部分肯定说的争论。学说争论之背后是“部分实行全部责任”的处罚原则和共同正犯本质也即犯罪共同说和行为共同说的分立,从承继共同正犯的理论根基出发进行分析,修正肯定说在理论上立足于整体主义承认共同正犯的存在,同时兼顾个人责任原则,是更为合理的理论选择。此种理论在司法实务中对单一犯和复合犯的认定也具有实践价值,具有其他理论路径所不具有的实践合理性。In the theory of successive accomplice perpetrator crime,the imputation of the latter actor is not only an important controversial issue in the criminal law circle,but also a practical problem in judicial practice.As to whether the latter actor should be imputed,there is a debate among simply confirmed theory,purely negative theory and partly confirmed theory in academic circles.Behind the theoretical debate is the principle of punishment of"part action with full liability"and the separation of the essence of joint principal offender,that is,the theory of joint crime and the theory of joint behavior.Starting from the theoretical foundation of inheriting the joint principal offender,the revised affirmation theory is a more reasonable theoretical choice based on holism to admit the existence of the joint principal offender,taking into account the principle of individual responsibility.This theory has practical value in the identification of single crime and compound crime in judicial practice and also has practical rationality that other theoretical paths do not have.

关 键 词：承继共同正犯 部分实行全部责任 犯罪共同说 行为共同说 

分 类 号：D924[政治法律—刑法学]