刑事缺席审判制度论纲  

The Outline on the System of Criminal Trial by Default

作　　者：孟军[1] 朱虹宇 Meng Jun;Zhu Hongyu

机构地区：[1]北京师范大学法学院,北京100875

出　　处：《南海法学》2021年第6期43-53,共11页The South China Sea Law Journal

基　　金：司法部课题“正当程序视野下的刑事缺席审判法律制度研究”(编号:18SFB2026)。

摘　　要：被告人出席法庭既是诉讼权利也是诉讼义务。对席审判为刑事诉讼常态,而缺席审判为例外。缺席审判的内涵界定决定了缺席审判程序的适用案件范围及适用条件。审判程序要素缺失使得缺席审判程序具有天然缺陷性,但缺席审判作为诉讼程序不得突破正当程序底限正义原则,特定诉讼权利不可克减。同对席审判相比缺席审判救济程序及证明制度具有特殊性。缺席审判救济除遵循一般救济程序外,还设置特殊救济途径。缺席审判证明客体及证明标准体现出多元性和层次性。The defendant's attendance at the court is not only a litigation right but also a litigation obligation.The trial of the defendant in absentia is an exception to the trial in person.The definition of the connotation about the trial by default determines the cases scope and application conditions of the trial by default procedure.The lack of trial procedure elements makes the trial procedure by default have natural defects.However,the trial by default as a litigation procedure can not break through the justice principle of due process,and the specific litigation rights can not be derogated.Compared with the trial in person,the relief procedure and litigation proof of the trial by default are special.Besides following the general remedy procedure,the legislation also sets up special relief channels.The object of proof and the standard of proof in the trial by default reflect the diversity and hierarchy.

关 键 词：缺席审判 适用条件 正当程序 救济途径 诉讼证明 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]