检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李琛 LI Chen(Department of Journalism,School of Culture and Communication,Beijing International Studies University,Beijing 100024,China)
机构地区:[1]北京第二外国语学院文化与传播学院新闻系,北京100024
出 处:《北京城市学院学报》2021年第6期16-26,共11页Journal of Beijing City University
基 金:北京市社科基金青年项目“从社会认知心理学角度解析当今群体性雾霾焦虑及其归因机制”(15SHC033)。
摘 要:近年来京津冀地区针对空气污染的“蓝天保卫战”成效显著,但其“区域复合型”污染的防治依然复杂、耗时。在此过程中饱受过雾霾困扰的北京居民都有何关切及困惑值得探究。通过问卷统计与质性访谈相结合的方式,本课题组发现,受访者对于雾霾成因的认知存在明显分歧,尤其会围绕“汽车尾气是否为主因”延伸出两元对立思维,并由此而产生出证实偏差及错觉关联以维系各自信念体系。另外还有受访者能结合情景性因素进行启发式推断,比如从周边工业排放和冬季供暖共性中强调过于依赖燃煤的危害性。这些思维定势及偏差为如何引导政策认知及凝聚治理共识提供了相应启示。The“Blue Sky”campaign aiming to tackle the air pollution in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region has progressed well,but it still requires a great deal of patience and efforts to curb such a complex problem as the smog.By using a mixed method of surveys and interviews,this study investigates Beijing residents perceptions of what caused the smog as a way of understanding public concerns and policy implications.It finds opinions diverge greatly,especially with a dichotomy over whether car emission is the main cause,within the explanatory framework of which confirmation bias and illusory correlation are further developed.Moreover,contextual factors are referred to for heuristics in which,for example,high-sulphur coals are singled out to reflect the common problem between heavy industries and winter heating.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117