检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:程祎凡 蒋梓轩 方可 林逸飞[3] 龙囿霖 杜亮[1,5] 黄进[4] CHENG Yifan;JIANG Zixuan;FANG Ke;LIN Yifei;LONG Youlin;DU Liang;HUANG Jin(Chinese Evidence-Based Medicine Centre,West China Hospital,Sichuan University,Chengdu 610041,P.R.China;West China School of Public Health,Sichuan University,Chengdu 610041,P.R.China;Precision Medicine Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province&Precision Medicine Center,West China Hospital,Sichuan University,Chengdu 610041,P.R.China;Medical Device Regulatory Research and Evaluation Centre,West China Hospital,Sichuan University,Chengdu 610041,P.R.China;West China Medical Publishers,West China Hospital,Sichuan University,Chengdu 610041,P.R.China)
机构地区:[1]四川大学华西医院中国循证医学中心,成都610041 [2]四川大学华西公共卫生学院,成都610041 [3]四川大学华西医院精准医学中心,成都610041 [4]四川大学华西医院医疗器械监管研究与评价中心,成都610041 [5]四川大学华西医院华西期刊社,成都610041
出 处:《中国循证医学杂志》2021年第12期1441-1449,共9页Chinese Journal of Evidence-based Medicine
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(编号:72074161)。
摘 要:目的对质子重离子放射治疗效果的系统评价进行再评价。方法计算机检索CNKI、WanFang Data、PubMed、EMbase数据库,检索时限均从2007年1月至2020年11月。由2名研究者独立筛选文献、提取资料,并采用AMSTAR 2评估纳入研究质量后,采用定性描述分析进行系统评价再评价。结果共纳入6篇系统评价。纳入的系统评价中,中等质量1篇、极低质量5篇。质子重离子放疗的应用广泛,对全身多部位多类型的肿瘤的治疗效果优于传统放射治疗方法,且不良反应少见、轻微。其中,重离子放疗的有效性和安全性均优于质子放疗。结论现有证据显示,质子重离子放疗的有效性、安全性较好,但系统评价的方法学质量有待提高,未来仍需高质量、大样本的研究验证。Objective To overview the systematic reviews of the effectiveness and safety of the charged-particle radiation therapy.Methods Databases including CNKI,WanFang Data,PubMed,and EMbase were electronically searched from January 2007 to November 2020.Two investigators independently screened literature,extracted data,and assessed the quality of the included studies by AMSTAR 2,and then reported results through a narrative synthesis of outcomes.Results A total of 6 systematic reviews were identified.One systematic review demonstrated moderate quality and the other 5 demonstrated critically low quality.The charged-particle radiation therapy had a wide range of applications.Its effectiveness was superior to traditional radiotherapy methods on various types of tumors in various regions of the body,with acceptable side effects.Specifically,the effectiveness and safety outcomes of carbon ion radiotherapy was superior to those of proton radiotherapy.Conclusions Current evidence shows that the chargedparticle radiation therapy has superior effectiveness and limited toxicity,though the studies are of relatively low quality.High quality and larger sample size researches are required in the future.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117