“六诗”原论  

The Original Theory of"Six Poems"

作　　者：周哲良[1] ZHOU Zheliang(Editorial Department of Journal,Sichuan Vocational and Technical College,Suining 629000,China)

机构地区：[1]四川职业技术学院学报编辑部,四川遂宁629000

出　　处：《四川职业技术学院学报》2021年第6期99-105,共7页Journal of Sichuan Vocational and Technical College

摘　　要：“六诗”之名出《周礼》,历代争论不已。郭绍虞先生概括为“经学家”和“文学家”之争,表现为“三体三用”“六诗皆体”“六诗皆用”等诸多“体用”论的观点。根据郑玄《周礼注》的解释并受郭绍虞先生分“风”与“赋比兴”为大小类的启发,研究认为:郑玄对“六诗”的训释均关乎礼乐教化符合当时的实际。“风雅颂”是内容类别,“赋比兴”是“风”下的三个小类,既有内容的不同,也有用诗的方式方法的选择,“风赋比兴雅颂”的顺序理所应当。《诗经》及以后,“风雅颂”保存其诗,而“赋比兴”的内容属性淡化,只保留其用诗方式方法的规定性而独立出来,并在以后向“三体三用”发展。The name of "Six Poems" came out of "Zhou Li", which has been controversial throughout the ages. Mr. Guo Shaoyu summed it up as the dispute between "the scholar of classics" and the "literary scholar", which manifested in the viewpoints of "three types and three functions", "six poems of styles", "six poems of styles for use" and many other theories. According to the explanation of Zheng Xuan’s notes on"Zhou Li Zhu"and inspired by Guo Shaoyu’s classification of "Feng" and "Fu Bi Xing", the study holds that Zheng Xuan’s explanation of "Six Poems" is all related to the combination of rites and music education and the reality of the time. "Feng Ya Song" is the content category, "Fu Bi Xing" is the three sub-categories under "Feng". There are not only differences in content,but also the choice of poetic methods. "Feng Fu Bi Xing Ya Song" order is natural. In the"Book of Songs"and later works, "Feng Ya Song" preserved its poems, while "Fu Bi Xing" weakened its content attributes and only retained the regulation of poetic methods, and then developed to "three types and three functions".

关 键 词：“六诗” 郑玄 《周礼注》 “体用论” 

分 类 号：I206.09[文学—中国文学]