机构地区:[1]南开大学附属第四中心医院神经内科,天津300140 [2]保定市徐水区人民医院内科,072550
出 处:《中华神经医学杂志》2021年第12期1248-1253,共6页Chinese Journal of Neuromedicine
摘 要:目的探讨糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)指导下阿替普酶(rt-PA)静脉溶栓治疗老年急性脑梗死伴血糖超标的安全性和有效性。方法回顾性纳入自2018年1月至2021年6月南开大学附属第四中心医院收治的262例老年急性脑梗死患者, 将入院血糖在2.8~22.2 mmol/L且接受rt-PA标准剂量静脉溶栓的72例患者纳入对照组;将入院血糖超过22.2 mmol/L、HbA1c检测值小于15.59%的患者纳入试验组, 并进一步根据患者是否接受rt-PA静脉溶栓及rt-PA用量将试验组患者分为保守治疗组(63例)、rt-PA小剂量组(0.6 mg/kg, 最大剂量为60 mg, 67例)和rt-PA标准剂量组(0.9 mg/kg, 最大剂量为90 mg, 60例)。参考NINDS临床试验制定的治疗效果评价标准评价治疗后24 h有效率、治疗后7 d短期预后;采用改良Rankin量表(mRS)评分评价患者治疗后90 d时远期预后。安全性评价指标主要包括治疗90 d内的颅内出血率及并发症发生率。结果 (1)治疗有效率及短期预后:治疗24 h后, 4组患者治疗有效率差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);其中对照组、rt-PA小剂量组和rt-PA标准剂量组有效率均高于保守组, 差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗7 d后, 4组患者预后良好率差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);其中对照组、rt-PA小剂量组和rt-PA标准剂量组预后良好率均高于保守组, 差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。(2)治疗90 d时远期预后:对照组、保守治疗组、rt-PA小剂量组和rt-PA标准剂量组90 d预后良好例数分别为59(81.9%)、46(73.0%)、53(79.1%)和46(76.7%), 差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。(3)治疗90 d内颅内出血及并发症发生率:4组患者治疗后90 d内颅内出血率差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);其中rt-PA标准剂量组、rt-PA小剂量组颅内出血率明显高于对照组及保守组, 且rt-PA标准剂量组的颅内出血率明显高于rt-PA小剂量组, 差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。对照组、保守治疗组、rt-PA小剂量组和rt-PA标准剂量组患者治疗后90 d�Objective To investigate the safety and efficacy of intravenous thrombolysis with recombinant human tissue-type plasminogen activator(rt-PA)in acute cerebral infarction combined with hyperglycemia under the guidance of glycosylated hemoglobin Alc(HbAlc)level in the elderly.Methods A retrospective study was performed.Two hundred and sixty-two elderly patients with acute cerebral infarction,admitted to our hospital from January 2018 to June 2021,were chosen in this study.Patients with admission blood glucose of 2.8-22.2 mmol/L and accepted intravenous thrombolysis with standard dose of rt-PA were enrolled into control group;patients with admission blood glucose over 22.2 mmol/L and HbAlc less than 15.59%were enrolled into experimental group.The patients in the experimental group were subdivided into conservative treatment group(n=63),rt-PA low-dose group(0.6 mg/kg,maximum dose 60 mg,n=61)and rt-PA standard dose group(0.9 mg/kg,maximum dose 90 mg,n=60)according to whether these patients received rt-PA intravenous thrombolysis or not and dosage of rt-PA.The response rate 24 h after treatment and short-term prognosis 7 d after treatment were evaluated by referring to the treatment effectiveness evaluation criteria developed by NINDS clinical trials.The long-term prognosis was evaluated by modified Rankin Scale(mRS)90 d after treatment.The safety evaluation indexes mainly included incidences of intracranial hemorrhage and complications within 90 d of treatment.Results(1)The response rate 24 h after treatment showed significant differences among the 4 groups(P<0.05):that in the control group,rt-PA low-dose group,and rt-PA standard dose group was significantly higher than that in the conservative treatment group(P<0.05);the good prognosis rate 7 d after treatment showed significant differences among the 4 groups:that in the control group,rt-PA low-dose group,and rt-PA standard dose group was significantly higher than that in the conservative treatment group(P<0.05).(2)Ninety d after treatment,59 patients(81.9%),46(73.0%)
分 类 号:R743.33[医药卫生—神经病学与精神病学] R587.1[医药卫生—临床医学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...