检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:徐琳[1] 穆春宇 XU Lin;MU Chun-yu(School of Law,Hangzhou Dianzi University,Hangzhou Zhejiang 310018,China)
机构地区:[1]杭州电子科技大学法学院,浙江杭州310018
出 处:《杭州电子科技大学学报(社会科学版)》2021年第6期72-76,共5页Journal of Hangzhou Dianzi University:Social Sciences
基 金:教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(20YJC840033)。
摘 要:基于“无人车致死不负刑责”这一事件,对相关微博数据采用话题模型与情感分析实证考察了网民的态度。研究发现,网民对该事件的讨论集中在人机对比、法律与判责、行人违规、车辆驾驶、无人驾驶技术五个方面。在对事件的评价中出现了态度极化,网民的正面情感较为分散,而负面情感容易发生聚集。在五个话题中,除了人机对比的情感比较中立,其他四个话题均聚集了较多的负面情感,这反映了网民对行人违规的反感,对无人驾驶技术不成熟的担忧,和对无人车所带来的法律困境的关注。Based on the news about“Uber won't face criminal charges after its robocar killed woman crossing street”,topic models and sentiment analysis of microblog data are adopted to evaluate the netizens'attitudes towards self-driving.The results show that the comments of netizens on this news focused on five aspects:human-machine comparison,laws and judgment,pedestrian violation,vehicle driving,and self-driving technology.Attitudes towards this piece of news are polarized.The positive emotions are relatively scattered,while the negative emotions tend to be clustered.Among the five topics,except for the topic of human-machine comparison,of which the polarity is neutral,the polarity of the rest four topics are negative,which indicates that the netizens has negative attitudes towards pedestrian violations,and show their concern towards the immature self-driving technology and the legal dilemma caused by unmanned vehicles.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15