检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:姜晓涵 Jiang Xiaohan(Sport College of Shandong University,Jinan 250061,Shandong,China.)
出 处:《体育科技文献通报》2022年第1期163-166,共4页Bulletin of Sport Science & Technology
摘 要:运用文献资料法和逻辑分析法,从美国体育学博士评估的发展历程出发,对美国的体育学博士教育评估体系进行探析,为我国体育学博士教育评估体系的建设提供经验借鉴。研究发现,基于专业的评估组织,不断完善的评估指标体系和科学的评估方法,美国对体育学博士评估深度聚焦学科质量,以实现自我改进、自我提升为目标。我国的体育学博士评估应主动吸收美国体育学博士评估的经验,从坚持质量导向的评估理念,构建专业的评估组织体系以及倡导多元主体共同参与等方面来推动体育学博士教育质量的提升。By using the methods of literature review and logical analysis,this paper analyzes the evaluation system of doctor of physical education in the United States from the perspective of sport PHD evaluation development in the United States,so as to provide experience for the construction of the evaluation system of doctor of physical education in China.The study found that based on professional evaluation organizations,constantly improving evaluation index system and scientific evaluation methods,the evaluation of sport PHD in the United States focuses on discipline quality,with the goal of self-improvement and self-improvement.China’s PHD evaluation should actively absorb the experience of US,and promote quality from the aspects of adhering to the quality-oriented evaluation concept,building a professional evaluation organization system and advocating the joint participation of multiple subjects.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.216.70.76