检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吴秀明[1] WU Xiu-ming(Department of Chinese Language and Literature,Zhejiang University,Hangzhou 310058,China)
出 处:《宁波大学学报(人文科学版)》2022年第1期23-32,共10页Journal of Ningbo University:Liberal Arts Edition
摘 要:历史小说研究虽是个人化的学术实践活动,但它在一定程度上也反映了新时期以来当代历史小说批评和研究的总体情景及发展脉络。历史小说研究大体经历了从批评到理论再到综合三个阶段或曰三种研究方式。如何“历史”,怎样“小说”,这是一个相当复杂且人言人殊的问题。回顾和总结过往走过的道路,感受和体会最深的,是需要正视并处理好“创新与规范”“寻找‘根据地’与超越‘根据地’”“批评与研究”三方面关系。这不仅对历史小说,其治学有关问题与方法,对更为宏大的当代文学研究也具有重要的借鉴意义。Although the research on historical novels is a personal activity of academic practice,it also reflects the whole picture and evolution about the criticism and research on contemporary historical novels.Specifically,the research went through three different phases or ways:criticism,theoretical innovation,and synthetic study.How do we talk about historical topics,and how to novelize them?This is quite a complicated question,and the answer could be various.Looking back of the coming path,my deepest feeling and experience is the importance of facing up and properly handling the relationship between these three aspects:innovation and norms,finding“base”and transcending“base”,criticism and research.It is not only important to the research methods of historical novels,but also of great referential significance to broader study of contemporary literature.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.62