从疑难出发:《形而上学》B卷的辩证法阐明  

Going through Aporia:A Dialectical Clarification of Method in Metaphysics B

作　　者：吴亚女 WU Ya-nyu(Renmin University of China,Beijing 100872,China)

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学哲学院,北京100872

出　　处：《云南大学学报（社会科学版）》2022年第1期33-40,共8页The Journal of Yunnan University:Social Sciences Edition

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重大项目“陈康著作的整理、翻译与研究”(项目号:15ZDB011)的阶段性研究成果。

摘　　要：《形而上学》B卷提到的基于疑难的方法一般被认为是辩证法在哲学探究中的运用。然而,传统解释的许多观点与B卷并不一致,近些年来出现了一些将两者区分开的主张。本文通过对B卷和《论题篇》相关文本的深入分析,结合对亚里士多德辩证法的澄清,重新肯定疑难式方法与辩证法的内在一致性:疑难在辩证法所运用于之上的辩证问题的定义中占据核心地位,并且考察疑难所要求的一般和具体规则与辩证法被运用于哲学探究时的"解惑"要求一致。The aporia-based approach proposed in Aristotle’s Metaphysics B is generally considered to be the use of dialectic in philosophical inquiry,but some claims of traditional interpretation are inconsistent with Metaphysics B.In recent years,a number of claims have emerged to distinguish these two methods.However,through an intensive analysis of Metaphysics B and the relevant texts of Topics,combined with a clarification of Aristotelian dialectic,this paper re-affirms the internal consistency of the aporetic method with dialectical method:aporia occupies a central position in the definition of the dialectical problem on which dialectics is applied,and the general and specific rules required for going through aporia are the same as those required for diaporēsai when dialectic is applied to philosophical inquiry.

关 键 词：疑难 解惑 辩证法 反驳 解决 

分 类 号：B502.233[哲学宗教—外国哲学]